The Stoic Handbook with Jon Brooks

Before the first message, headline, or demand, practise the Stoic discipline of attention. This guided meditation introduces prosochē: noticing where the mind has gone and returning before an impression becomes an automatic judgement or action. It draws on Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 7.29, and Seneca, Letters 13.4. The sound, body, breath, and one-word labelling sequence is a modern guided adaptation, not a reconstructed ancient ritual. The point is not perfect concentration. The return is the practice.
Free 7-Day Stoic Challenge: stoicchallenge.co
The Stoic Vault: stoicvault.com

You look up and twenty minutes have gone. The problem is not only the phone. It is the tiny judgements your mind keeps accepting while you scroll.

In this episode, I explain prosochē, the Stoic practice of attention, and share Name the Hook: a one-word exercise for catching what has taken hold of you before shame takes over.
Free 7-Day Stoic Challenge: stoicchallenge.co
The Stoic Vault: stoicvault.com

Some mornings, nothing has gone wrong and the day already feels like too much. This guided Stoic morning practice starts from Marcus Aurelius's own argument with the bed in Meditations 5.1. Rather than manufacturing enthusiasm, you will choose one real reason to move and one obstacle to begin. The practice also draws on Meditations 5.20, where Marcus treats an obstruction as material for action. You do not need to feel ready. You need one honest start.
Free 7-Day Stoic Challenge: stoicchallenge.co
The Stoic Vault: stoicvault.com

We usually explain regret as knowing better but lacking discipline. This episode argues something more useful: in a hot state, the values on your internal scoreboard change.

I connect Epictetus with hot-cold empathy gaps, self-control replication research and implementation intentions. Then I give you a four-minute handover note: one specific if-then plan, written while you can still see clearly, for the version of you who will not realise their judgement has changed.

Sources and further reading:

- Epictetus, Discourses 1.28
- Seneca, Letters 76.34-35
- George Loewenstein, “Hot-Cold Empathy Gaps and Medical Decision Making” (2005)
- Hagger et al., “A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect” (2016)
- Peter Gollwitzer and Paschal Sheeran, “Implementation Intentions and Goal Achievement” (2006)
- Keith Stanovich, Richard West and Maggie Toplak, work on myside bias and rational thinking
Free 7-Day Stoic Challenge: stoicchallenge.co
The Stoic Vault: stoicvault.com

Stoicism says nobody does wrong on purpose: every bad act begins in a mistaken judgement about what is good. But does that survive contact with clear-eyed cruelty, compulsive habit and modern moral psychology?

I test the claim against Epictetus, Marcus Aurelius, Medea, research on psychopathy and the Stoics' own internal disagreement. Then I keep the practical part that still works: catching one assent before it hardens into action.

Sources and further reading:

- Epictetus, Discourses 1.28 and 2.17
- Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 2.1, 7.26 and 11.18
- Cicero, On Fate 42-43
- Aharoni, Sinnott-Armstrong and Kiehl, “Can Psychopathic Offenders Discern Moral Wrongs?” (2012)
- Aharoni, Sinnott-Armstrong and Kiehl, “What's Wrong? Moral Understanding in Psychopathic Offenders” (2014)
- Kühn and Gallinat, “Brain Structure and Functional Connectivity Associated With Pornography Consumption” (2014)
- Grubbs et al., “Pornography Problems Due to Moral Incongruence” (2019)
Free 7-Day Stoic Challenge: stoicchallenge.co
The Stoic Vault: stoicvault.com