Relaxed chat about the articles that Enrique Dans writes daily. Don't miss any of his analyses on the world of technology and always stay up to date on what's c...
The provided article discusses the increasing adoption of AI-generated models in the fashion industry. It highlights Swedish fast fashion giant H&M's recent announcement to use digital clones of models for social media, a move aimed at protecting models' rights while acknowledging the ongoing digitization of the profession. While some criticize this shift, some models see the potential for expanded opportunities through digital replicas. The author posits that the fashion industry will inevitably move towards fully synthetic models and even customized avatars, particularly as AI video technology advances. Luxury brands may initially resist, but the long-term trend suggests a significant decrease in the reliance on traditional, real-life models for showcasing clothing.This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «Welcome to the catwalk of the future«
--------
4:28
Can Gemini 2.5 Pro save Google from obsolescence?
Enrique Dans's article discusses Google's launch of Gemini 2.5 Pro as a crucial step in the company's effort to adapt to a changing technological landscape. Faced with the declining effectiveness of its advertising-based revenue model, Google is exploring a freemium strategy centered on its advanced AI. This shift is driven by the rise of conversational AI, which reduces the space and effectiveness of traditional advertising, and the competition from companies like OpenAI. Google aims to popularize Gemini and transition users to paid subscriptions, mirroring strategies adopted by competitors like OpenAI and Microsoft. The article highlights the significant challenge for Google, given its heavy reliance on advertising revenue, to successfully navigate this transition and remain competitive in the AI era.This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «Can Gemini 2.5 Pro save Google from obsolescence?»
--------
8:38
Reddit’s share price has taken a tumble: who’d have thought it?
Following a March 2024 IPO, Reddit's share price experienced a rapid surge, reaching a peak by February 2025. However, this growth proved unsustainable, leading to a significant decline in value by the end of March 2025. This downturn is attributed to Reddit's heavy dependence on Google traffic, which was negatively impacted by a search algorithm change, and challenges in diversifying its revenue beyond advertising, despite data deals with AI companies. Concerns also exist regarding the difficulty for user-generated content platforms like Reddit to balance monetization with maintaining community authenticity. Consequently, analysts have issued negative ratings, suggesting the company's potential is overvalued and its initial public offering may become a failure.This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «Reddit’s share price has taken a tumble: who’d have thought it?»
--------
3:41
Can AI save X from Elon Musk?
In March 2025, Elon Musk's AI startup, xAI, acquired X (formerly Twitter) in an all-stock deal. This transaction valued xAI at $80 billion and X at $33 billion, raising questions about Musk essentially selling his own company to himself. The article highlights that X's value had decreased since Musk's 2022 purchase, potentially disappointing recent investors. Comparisons are drawn to past controversial acquisitions, suggesting possible conflicts of interest and insider trading opportunities. The author questions whether this move strategically benefits both entities or serves to artificially inflate the value of a struggling asset. Ultimately, the acquisition positions X as a testing ground for xAI's ambitions to have AI own the online conversation.This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «Can AI save X from Elon Musk?»
--------
4:45
Is AI becoming a global race between the tortoise and the hare?
This article discusses a perceived divergence in AI development strategies between the United States and China. The US approach is characterized by substantial, private sector-driven investments in AI data centers. In contrast, China appears to be adopting a more measured and environmentally conscious strategy, reassessing its data center investments partly due to the emergence of more efficient AI models and environmental regulations. This difference raises questions about the sustainability and long-term implications of each nation's chosen path in the global AI race. The piece suggests a potential "tortoise and the hare" dynamic, with China prioritizing a steadier approach.This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «Is AI becoming a global race between the tortoise and the hare?»
Relaxed chat about the articles that Enrique Dans writes daily. Don't miss any of his analyses on the world of technology and always stay up to date on what's coming, the changing world we face and how not to get lost in it
#AIGenerated
Netherlands