The Greener Way

🌳 Should banks stop financing deforestation in Australia?
❓ Question:
What role do Australian banks play in deforestation, and how can financial institutions better manage nature-related risks within their lending portfolios?
✅ Answer:
According to Max Hamra, corporate accountability analyst at the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF), Australia's major banks are linked to significant deforestation activity through agricultural lending, highlighting the growing importance of nature-related financial risks. ACF's latest investigation identified more than 16,000 hectares of deforestation linked to properties financed by major lenders, with impacts including the loss of high-carbon forests and critical habitat for endangered species such as koalas and greater gliders.
Hamra argues that banks should increasingly treat deforestation as a core risk management issue rather than solely a sustainability concern. He believes nature-related risks should be embedded within credit and lending processes, with leadership from boards, executives and risk teams helping drive action across institutions.
Rather than demanding immediate deforestation-free commitments, ACF advocates a more practical approach. It wants banks to first build the data, systems and stakeholder engagement needed to understand the issue, establish clear pathways for improvement, and then introduce commitments that are achievable and measurable. Hamra says the goal is to align banking practices with Australia's broader environmental objectives, including global commitments to halt nature loss and deforestation by 2030.
Key insights:
🌟 More than 16,000 hectares of deforestation were identified in the latest ACF investigation The report linked a significant number of deforestation cases to land with bank-financed mortgages, highlighting the scale of nature-related risks within agricultural lending portfolios.
🌟 All major Australian banks were linked to investigated cases
🌟 Nature risk is becoming a mainstream financial issue
🌟 Investor engagement is accelerating
🌟 Some Australian banks are beginning to develop frameworks
🌟 Strong leadership is critical
🚩 Risks:
🚩 Deforestation creates significant emissions
🚩 Biodiversity loss threatens ecosystems
🚩 Agricultural productivity may suffer over time
🚩 Banks face growing reputational and financial risk
🚩 Progress across the sector remains uneven
⚠️ Things to watch:
⚠️ Deforestation-free commitments require substantial preparation Banks need better data, systems and stakeholder engagement before they can confidently implement and monitor meaningful commitments.
⚠️ Most deforestation identified was linked to agricultural expansion The report found that approximately 99% of investigated clearing related to expanding agricultural activity rather than residential development.
⚠️ Global expectations are rising quickly International banks are increasingly making nature-related and deforestation-related commitments, potentially creating pressure on Australian institutions to follow.
⚠️ Nature loss is moving up the ESG agenda After years of focus on climate emissions, biodiversity and natural capital issues are emerging as major priorities for investors and financial institutions.
💡 Why it matters:
As global commitments to halt nature loss by 2030 approach, financial institutions will face increasing pressure to understand how lending decisions impact ecosystems, biodiversity and long-term economic resilience. The debate is no longer whether nature matters to finance, but how quickly institutions can integrate it into decision-making.
🎙️ Sources:
Max Hamra – corporate accountability analyst, Australian Conservation Foundation
Michelle Baltazar – Host, The Greener Way
⏱️ Timestamps:
00:00 – Why ACF is focusing on banks and deforestation
01:05 – How the investigation was conducted
02:36 – Key findings from the latest report
04:13 – Emissions impact of deforestation
05:29 – What ACF wants banks to do next
07:07 – Why nature risk is rising up the agenda
07:43 – The role of banks' risk teams
09:36 – How Australian banks compare globally
11:50 – Are local banks falling behind?
12:00 – Investor engagement and shareholder pressure
4:22 – Housing, agriculture and land clearing debate
15:57 – Soil health and ecosystem degradation
16:43 – Common misconceptions about ACF's proposals
17:36 – Why commitments should follow preparation
18:16 – Balancing ambition with practical action
🌿 We record on Gadigal Land and pay our respects to the traditional custodians of Country and elders past and present.

This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:

OP3 - https://op3.dev/privacy

🌏 Is climate tech the next big investment opportunity in Asia-Pacific?
❓ Question:
Why are investors increasingly looking at climate technology, and what should Australian investors consider when assessing climate tech opportunities across Asia-Pacific?
✅ Answer:
According to Ayush Kapila, co-founder and operating partner of Vitality Capital Partners, climate technology is becoming a major investment theme because many of the technologies needed to achieve net zero have not yet been fully developed or commercialised. He argues that around 30% to 40% of the technologies required for net zero remain in the prototype stage, creating significant opportunities for investors willing to back innovation.
Kapila believes the greatest opportunity sits in Asia-Pacific, which accounts for more than half of global emissions and a large share of future energy demand growth. Rather than viewing climate tech as a niche sustainability investment, he sees it as a broad opportunity to support commercially viable businesses solving everyday problems across energy, transport, food systems, agriculture, water, industry and the circular economy. For investors, success depends not only on the environmental benefits of a technology, but whether it can deliver efficiency gains, competitive costs and strong commercial returns.
🌟 Asia-Pacific is one of the world's largest climate tech opportunities
More than half of global emissions originate from the Asia-Pacific region, creating a significant need for technologies that can support decarbonisation while meeting growing energy and infrastructure demand.
🌟 Many net-zero technologies are still being developed
Kapila estimates that 30% to 40% of the technologies needed to achieve global net-zero targets remain in the prototype or development stage, creating opportunities for venture capital and private market investors.
🌟 Climate tech extends far beyond renewable energy
The sector includes innovations across sustainable aviation fuel, water treatment, food systems, transport, industrial efficiency, circular economy solutions, agriculture and blue economy technologies.
🌟 Cost competitiveness is critical for success
Technologies that reduce costs and improve efficiency are more likely to gain widespread adoption than those requiring customers to pay a "green premium."
🌟 Australia's climate tech ecosystem is growing rapidly
Vitality Capital Partners identified approximately 690 climate tech companies headquartered in Australia, with a median founding year of 2021, highlighting the sector's strong recent growth.
🌟 Commercial returns remain the priority
Kapila argues that climate tech investing does not require sacrificing returns and should be viewed as a commercial growth opportunity rather than solely an impact investment.
🌟 Strong founders often emerge from established industries
Many successful climate tech founders have backgrounds in banking, funds management, large corporates and institutional organisations, bringing industry expertise to emerging challenges.
🌟 New capital structures are emerging
Initiatives involving institutional investors, government-backed organisations and structured finance are helping bridge funding gaps for climate-related businesses.
🚩 Early-stage investing remains high risk
Many climate technologies are still relatively young businesses and face significant execution, commercialisation and scaling challenges.
🚩 Fund size mismatches can limit institutional participation
Many climate venture funds are smaller than the typical allocation size required by large superannuation funds, making it difficult for institutions to deploy meaningful amounts of capital.
🚩 Liquidity remains a challenge
Venture capital investments often take longer to realise returns, creating potential conflicts with institutional investors' liquidity requirements.
🚩 First-of-a-kind projects carry significant execution risk
Capital-intensive projects and emerging technologies require experienced managers and operators to successfully scale businesses.
🚩 Market conditions remain difficult
Fundraising for early-stage ventures has become more challenging in recent years, creating additional pressure on managers and founders.
⚠️ Not every climate solution becomes a successful investment
Strong environmental credentials alone do not guarantee commercial success. Investors must assess revenue opportunities, scalability and market demand.
⚠️ Technology development timelines remain uncertain
Many solutions essential to future decarbonisation pathways have yet to reach commercial maturity.
⚠️ Investor expectations may not align with venture timelines
Climate technology investments often require longer holding periods before achieving exits or generating returns.
⚠️ Public perceptions can create barriers
Terms such as "climate", "impact" and "sustainability" can attract political or ideological debate despite underlying commercial opportunities.
💡 Why it matters:
Climate technology is emerging as one of the most significant investment themes of the net-zero transition. As governments, companies and consumers seek solutions to reduce emissions while maintaining economic growth, investors are increasingly looking at businesses that can deliver both sustainability outcomes and commercial returns. For Australian investors, the rapid expansion of climate tech across Asia-Pacific presents opportunities to access innovation in sectors ranging from energy and transport to food, water and industrial efficiency. However, the sector's early-stage nature means careful manager selection, diversification and risk assessment remain critical.
🎙️ Sources:
Ayush Kapila, co-founder and operating partner, Vitality Capital Partners
Michelle Baltazar, host, The Greener Way
⏱️ Timestamps:
00:00 – Why climate tech matters for net zero
01:12 – The origins of Vitality Capital Partners
02:00 – Climate tech companies in the portfolio
03:00 – Climate tech's role in an investment portfolio
04:03 – Why emerging technologies matter
05:00 – Australia's 690 climate tech companies
06:09 – Assessing climate tech investment opportunities
07:20 – Commercial demand, regulation and execution risk
07:33 – Who builds successful climate tech businesses?
08:37 – Why more superannuation money isn't flowing into climate tech
09:27 – Fund size and capital allocation challenges
10:34 – Liquidity and exit challenges
11:05 – Emerging investment solutions and structures
12:16 – The biggest misconceptions about climate tech
13:04 – Climate tech as a commercial investment opportunity
13:44 – The future of Vitality Capital Partners
🌿 We record on Gadigal Land and pay our respects to the traditional custodians of Country and elders past and present.

This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:

OP3 - https://op3.dev/privacy

⚕️ Can hospitals cut emissions by 44%? The surprising case for reusing "single-use" medical devices
❓ Question:
How can remanufacturing single-use medical devices help reduce healthcare waste, improve supply chain resilience and lower emissions without compromising patient safety?
✅ Answer:
According to Daniel Vukelich, president of the Association of Medical Device Reprocessors (AMDR), healthcare's reliance on single-use medical devices has created significant waste, emissions and supply chain vulnerabilities. While many devices are labelled for single use, remanufacturing companies can clean, validate, test and sterilise eligible products so they can be safely used again.
Vukelich argues that remanufacturing offers a practical circular economy solution that reduces costs, cuts healthcare emissions, improves supply chain resilience and recovers valuable materials that would otherwise be discarded. With healthcare accounting for around 5% of global emissions and increasing pressure on global supply chains following COVID-19 and geopolitical disruptions, he believes circular healthcare models will become increasingly important for hospitals, policymakers and investors.
🌟 Healthcare is a major contributor to global emissions
If healthcare were a country, it would rank among the world's largest emitters. Healthcare-related activities account for approximately 5% of global emissions, making decarbonisation a growing priority for the sector.
🌟 Circular healthcare can reduce dependence on fragile supply chains
COVID-19 exposed vulnerabilities in global medical supply chains. Remanufacturing enables hospitals to extend the life of existing devices and reduces dependence on imported products and raw materials.
🌟 Valuable materials can be recovered and reused
Many medical devices contain microchips, rare earth metals, gold and other valuable materials. Remanufacturing helps recover these resources rather than sending them to landfill or incineration.
🌟 Hospitals can significantly reduce procurement costs
The remanufacturing industry has delivered substantial savings to healthcare systems by allowing eligible devices to be safely reused rather than constantly replaced with new products.
🌟 Emissions can be reduced by remanufacturing devices closer to home
Lifecycle assessments suggest remanufacturing can reduce emissions by around 44% compared with manufacturing entirely new devices because fewer raw materials need to be extracted, processed and transported.
🌟 Scope 3 emissions present a major opportunity
Around 70% of hospital emissions originate from supply chains rather than hospital operations. Addressing procurement and medical device lifecycles could have a larger impact than operational changes alone.
🌟 Australia is moving closer to developing a remanufacturing sector
Several companies have announced plans to invest in Australian remanufacturing capability, while regulators continue to assess the appropriate framework for medical device reuse and remanufacturing.
🌟 Circular business models could become a competitive advantage
Vukelich believes medical technology companies that extend product lifecycles and offer circular solutions are likely to be better positioned as healthcare systems focus more on sustainability and resilience.
🚩 Regulatory frameworks are still evolving
Australia is still developing the regulatory settings required to support a larger remanufacturing industry while maintaining patient safety and clinical confidence.
🚩 Existing healthcare procurement models favour single-use products
Many purchasing decisions remain focused on upfront unit costs rather than whole-of-life costs, supply chain security and environmental impacts.
🚩 Established business models may resist change
Manufacturers that rely on selling new devices may be reluctant to adopt circular approaches that extend product lifespans and reduce replacement rates.
🚩 Clinical participation is critical
Remanufacturing programs depend on hospitals consistently collecting and separating eligible devices for reuse. Without clinician engagement, significant benefits can be lost.
⚠️ Healthcare's environmental footprint is larger than many realise
Despite healthcare's mission to improve health outcomes, the sector remains a significant source of waste and carbon emissions.
⚠️ Supply chain disruptions are becoming a strategic risk
Pandemics, trade tensions, tariffs and geopolitical conflicts continue to create uncertainty in healthcare supply chains, increasing costs and reducing resilience.
⚠️ Sustainability alone will not drive change
Vukelich argues that adoption must be supported by strong business and financial cases, not environmental benefits alone.
⚠️ Procurement practices may determine the pace of adoption
Unless healthcare buyers actively reward sustainable and circular solutions, progress towards circular healthcare models may remain slow.
💡 Why it matters:
Healthcare is increasingly being viewed through both a sustainability and supply chain lens. As hospitals seek to reduce costs, improve resilience and cut emissions, circular approaches such as medical device remanufacturing are attracting greater attention globally. For investors, healthcare providers and policymakers, the transition from a linear "take-make-waste" model to a circular healthcare system could create new commercial opportunities while helping address waste, carbon emissions and resource constraints.
🎙️ Sources:
Daniel Vukelich, president, Association of Medical Device Reprocessors (AMDR)
Michelle Baltazar, host, The Greener Way
⏱️ Timestamps:
00:00 – Why healthcare emissions matter
01:25 – What circular healthcare means
01:49 – The rise of single-use medical devices
02:35 – What remanufacturing and reprocessing involve
03:34 – Common misconceptions about reuse and recycling
04:15 – How COVID changed the conversation
05:00 – Types of devices that can be remanufactured
06:12 – Cost savings and supply chain resilience
07:33 – Australia's emerging remanufacturing opportunity
08:40 – The emissions benefits of remanufacturing
09:37 – Healthcare's carbon footprint and Scope 3 emissions
10:26 – Barriers and industry resistance
11:49 – Regulation, procurement and policy priorities
12:49 – The future of circular healthcare
13:36 – Potential benefits for developing countries
14:09 – Sustainability, business and healthcare waste reduction
🌿 We record on Gadigal Land and pay our respects to the traditional custodians of Country and elders past and present.

This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:

OP3 - https://op3.dev/privacy

🌿 Australia's climate capital challenge: Why investors want to spend billions but can't find enough opportunities
❓ Question:
Why are Australia's largest investors struggling to deploy more climate capital locally, and what needs to change to attract the investment required for the country's net-zero transition?
✅ Answer:
According to Rebecca Mikula-Wright, chief executive of the Investor Group on Climate Change (IGCC), institutional investors remain highly committed to climate-related investing despite geopolitical uncertainty, energy security concerns and market volatility. Australia's superannuation funds and institutional investors increasingly view climate change as both a financial risk and a major investment opportunity.
However, while investor appetite for climate solutions continues to grow, there remains a shortage of investable opportunities that meet required risk and return thresholds. Mikula-Wright argues the challenge is not a lack of capital but a lack of policy certainty, project readiness and market signals that allow large-scale investment to flow efficiently. With Australia's super funds managing approximately $4.5 trillion and the nation requiring up to $630 billion of investment to meet its 2035 climate targets, she says getting policy settings right will determine whether that capital stays in Australia or moves elsewhere.
🌟 Clean energy remains the dominant climate investment theme
Renewable energy generation, transmission infrastructure and energy storage continue to attract the strongest investor interest. These sectors are viewed as critical to both emissions reduction and future energy security.
🌟 Climate adaptation is emerging as a major opportunity
Investors are increasingly moving beyond mitigation and emissions reduction to focus on adaptation and resilience. Around a third of investors now view climate adaptation as an investment opportunity rather than simply a risk that must be managed.
🌟 Asia is becoming more attractive for climate capital
Investor interest in climate opportunities across Asia is growing rapidly. As Australia competes for global capital, investors are increasingly evaluating overseas markets that offer stronger policy certainty and larger investment pipelines.
🌟 Energy security is reshaping investment decisions
Geopolitical tensions and concerns about energy supply are reinforcing support for electrification, renewable infrastructure and low-carbon fuels. Climate investment is increasingly being viewed through a national security lens.
🌟 Climate risks are being integrated into mainstream portfolios
Rather than limiting sustainability considerations to dedicated ethical funds, investors are increasingly embedding climate risks and opportunities across their entire portfolios and investment processes.
🌟 Climate adaptation finance could become a significant new asset class
Historically, governments have funded adaptation projects. As private investment markets mature, opportunities are emerging in infrastructure, resilience solutions and technologies designed to address physical climate risks.
🌟 Stewardship remains a key tool for investors
Shareholder engagement, voting and corporate stewardship continue to play an important role in influencing company behaviour. However, investors increasingly recognise that broader policy and market reforms are needed to drive system-wide change.
🌟 Mandatory climate reporting could improve investment decisions
As climate disclosure frameworks develop, investors expect to gain better visibility into how companies identify, manage and prepare for climate-related risks and opportunities.
🚩 A shortage of investment-ready projects remains a major barrier
Many investors say they want to allocate more capital but cannot find enough climate-aligned investments with suitable risk-return characteristics. This remains one of the biggest obstacles to scaling climate finance.
🚩 Policy uncertainty continues to slow capital deployment
Investors remain concerned about whether climate and energy policies will remain consistent across political cycles. Without long-term certainty, capital can remain on the sidelines or move overseas.
🚩 Slow approvals and regulatory bottlenecks are creating delays
Project approval processes, tax uncertainties and outdated regulatory frameworks are slowing the development of climate-related infrastructure and reducing the number of investable opportunities.
🚩 Australia faces growing competition for global capital
Investors have choices about where to deploy funds. If Australia cannot create an attractive investment environment, climate capital may increasingly flow to other regions.
⚠️ Capital availability does not guarantee investment
Mikula-Wright stresses that having trillions of dollars available for investment does not automatically mean that funds will be deployed. Effective policy design and implementation remain critical.
⚠️ Weak demand signals can undermine climate investment
Current market incentives are not always strong enough to stimulate demand for climate solutions, making it harder for projects to achieve commercial viability.
⚠️ Delays to the energy transition could impact long-term competitiveness
Failure to accelerate decarbonisation, clean energy deployment and climate adaptation may weaken Australia's ability to compete for future investment and trade opportunities.
💡 Why it matters:
Climate investing is moving from a niche sustainability strategy to a mainstream capital allocation issue. Australia's largest institutional investors are signalling that significant amounts of money are available for clean energy, climate adaptation and decarbonisation projects, but that capital needs investment-ready opportunities and stable policy settings. As Australia works toward its 2035 climate goals, the ability to attract and deploy climate capital may play a crucial role in determining the country's economic competitiveness, energy security and long-term prosperity.
🎙️ Sources:
Rebecca Mikula-Wright, chief executive, Investor Group on Climate Change (IGCC)
Riddhima Talwani, host, The Greener Way
⏱️ Timestamps:
00:00 – Why Australia needs climate investment capital
01:03 – Where climate sits among investor priorities
02:38 – Major climate investment themes driving capital
03:13 – Growth in clean energy and adaptation investing
04:04 – Why investors are looking increasingly towards Asia
05:00 – The gap between investor appetite and available opportunities
06:02 – Policy certainty and barriers to capital deployment
07:13 – How investors are engaging with policymakers
08:16 – The shift from ethical funds to portfolio-wide ESG integration
10:02 – Stewardship, shareholder voting and climate engagement
11:42 – What investors want from mandatory climate reporting
13:10 – IGCC's policy priorities and climate agenda
14:03 – National adaptation planning and climate finance
15:08 – Clean energy, low-carbon fuels and industrial decarbonisation
16:00 – Australia's role in supporting Asia's transition
16:35 – Why policy settings will determine where capital flows
17:08 – IGCC Summit and final remarks
FS Sustainability is a media partner of the IGCC Summit 2026 to be held on the 24-25 November at Ilumina Sydney. To register, click here.
🌿 We record on Gadigal Land and pay our respects to the traditional custodians of Country and elders past and present.

This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:

OP3 - https://op3.dev/privacy

🔥 Ethinvest: A call to make impact investing accessible for everyday Australians
❓ Question:
Impact investing has matured significantly over the past decade, but many of the most attractive opportunities remain out of reach for everyday investors. What is changing in the impact investing landscape, and how can investors use both their capital and their shareholder influence to create positive environmental and social outcomes?
✅ Answer:
According to Trevor Thomas, managing director of Ethinvest, impact investing is evolving from a niche market into an increasingly sophisticated asset class that is attracting institutional-grade fund managers and larger pools of capital. While impact investing has traditionally been dominated by wholesale investors, efforts are underway to make high-quality impact opportunities more accessible to retail investors.
Thomas explains that true impact investing differs from simply buying shares in companies with positive environmental or social credentials. Impact investments are intentionally designed to address a specific problem, measure the outcomes achieved and provide capital directly to projects that generate positive change. This can include renewable energy, affordable housing, environmental restoration and social impact initiatives.
Alongside capital allocation, Thomas argues investors should not underestimate the power of shareholder engagement. Over the past decade, shareholder activism and engagement campaigns have helped drive change across issues including climate disclosure, gambling, plastic waste, deforestation and biodiversity protection. Investors increasingly have two powerful tools available: where they invest their money and how they use their voice as shareholders.
🌟 Impact investing is becoming more institutional and mainstream
The first generation of impact investments was often innovative but relatively small in scale. Today, institutional fund managers are launching larger, more diversified impact funds with the potential to deliver market-like returns while creating measurable environmental and social outcomes.
🌟 True impact investing goes beyond buying ethical shares
Thomas distinguishes impact investing from traditional share investing. When investors purchase listed shares, the money typically goes to another shareholder. Impact investments, by contrast, direct capital towards creating new projects, assets and solutions that address social or environmental challenges.
🌟 Renewable energy and environmental infrastructure remain major themes
Some of the most prominent opportunities today include renewable energy infrastructure, battery storage, environmental water projects and decarbonisation initiatives. These investments are attracting increasing interest as governments, institutions and investors seek practical solutions to sustainability challenges.
🌟 Democratising impact investing remains a key goal
One of the biggest challenges facing the sector is accessibility. Many of the highest-quality impact funds remain restricted to wholesale investors. Thomas says efforts are underway to create investment vehicles that combine leading impact funds into structures that retail investors can access more easily.
🌟 Superannuation funds could play a larger role
Large super funds are increasingly allocating capital towards impact investments and are becoming more active participants in addressing challenges such as climate transition, clean technology development and affordable housing at scale.
🌟 Shareholder activism can drive meaningful change
Investor engagement has played a significant role in influencing corporate behaviour. Thomas highlights campaigns involving climate change, banking policies, biodiversity protection, plastic reduction and gambling exposure, demonstrating that investors can create change even when shareholder resolutions do not ultimately succeed.
🌟 Success is not always measured by winning the vote
Some engagement campaigns fail to achieve immediate outcomes but still generate important progress. Thomas points to climate-related shareholder advocacy that led companies to improve transparency and disclose previously unavailable information, helping investors better understand risks and corporate strategies.
🚩 Retail investors still face access barriers
Many impact investments involve long investment horizons of seven to ten years. These illiquid structures can be difficult for retail investors to access, creating a gap between investor demand and available products.
🚩 Patience is often required
Unlike publicly traded shares, many impact investments require investors to commit capital for extended periods before outcomes and returns are realised. This remains one of the sector's biggest structural challenges.
⚠️ Not every impact investment succeeds
While many impact investments have generated positive outcomes and competitive returns, others have faced challenges. Some projects were disrupted by external events such as COVID-19, highlighting the importance of diversification and careful manager selection.
⚠️ Impact measurement remains critical
As the sector grows, investors need confidence that managers are measuring and reporting outcomes consistently. Intentionality, measurable impact and additionality remain key characteristics that distinguish genuine impact investments from broader sustainability strategies.
🌟 Investors no longer need to sacrifice returns
Thomas believes one of the industry's biggest misconceptions is that ethical and impact investing inevitably leads to weaker financial performance. In most asset classes, investors can now access strategies that seek both commercial returns and measurable impact outcomes.
💡 Why it matters:
Impact investing is moving beyond its early experimental phase and becoming a more established part of the investment landscape. As institutional managers bring larger, more sophisticated products to market, access is gradually expanding and the opportunity set is widening. At the same time, investors are increasingly recognising that creating impact is not just about where money is invested, but also how shareholder rights are exercised. Understanding both capital allocation and engagement strategies may become increasingly important as investors seek to balance financial outcomes with positive environmental and social change.
🎙️ Sources:
Trevor Thomas, managing director, Ethinvest
Michelle Baltazar, host, The Greener Way
⏱️ Timestamps:
00:00 – Why impact investing needs to be democratised
00:17 – The evolution of impact investing
01:33 – What makes an investment a true impact investment
03:02 – Standout impact funds and recent opportunities
04:02 – The challenge of retail investor access
05:00 – Wholesale versus retail impact investing
06:38 – The role of super funds in driving impact
07:23 – Shareholder activism and investor influence
08:41 – Using shareholder resolutions to create change
10:07 – Lessons from climate engagement campaigns
11:00 – Biodiversity and salmon farming advocacy
11:49 – Impact investment performance and outcomes
12:37 – Why scale matters in impact investing
13:29 – The myth that impact investing underperforms
14:08 – Final thoughts and key takeaways
🌿 We record on Gadigal Land and pay our respects to the traditional custodians of country and elders past and present.

This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:

OP3 - https://op3.dev/privacy