Studio Stuff

Studio Stuff Podcast #42 | Mixing, Mastering, and the Mindset That Separates Them

You finish the mix, you're happy with it, you slap Ozone on the master bus... and now what? Do you keep tweaking? Do you bounce and walk away? Do you send it somewhere? One listener question about Tonal Balance Control opened up a conversation we've been circling around for a while, and this episode is where we finally went there.

We're talking about the mixing vs. mastering mindset, whether tools like Ozone belong on the mix bus, how AI mastering services fit into a real workflow, and why your answer to all of this probably depends more on your personality than your plugins.

You'll Learn:

Why Tonal Balance Control works great as a monitoring tool, not a mix bus effect

What separates a "mix-mastering" workflow from a proper two-stage process

When it makes sense to leave Ozone committed and keep tweaking the mix around it

Why Chris and Steve approach this completely differently, and why both approaches hold up

What AI mastering tools are actually good for, and where they fall short

Why mastering your own music is one of the best kept secrets for getting better at mixing

Topics and Stories:

Edward Stashko's listener question about Tonal Balance and Ozone on the mix bus

The Cubase control room advantage and why Steve is smug about it

Chris's recent shift toward mix-mastering and why he's owning it

Sending mixes out: Nashville, Montreal, Winnipeg, and Sterling Sound in New York

What happened when three mastering engineers got the same single

Steve officially becoming a grandpa in the Denny's parking lot

Listener Q&A:

Big shoutout to Edward Stashko for this week's question. He asked whether running a mix through Tonal Balance Control before using Ozone as an automated mastering tool produces a better result, and whether tweaking after the mastering stage creates problems that could have been caught earlier. Edward, you cracked this one wide open. Great question.



👉 Got a question for us?
📩 Submit it here: Form Link
We pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments.

And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.
It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.

Studio Stuff Podcast #41 | NS10 Translation in 2026: Emotion, Mixing, and What Actually Works

What does emotion in music actually mean? And does your mix have to make someone cry to count as art? We got a comment on our Angine de Poitrine episode that sent us down a rabbit hole, and we're not mad about it.

In this episode, we're responding to a listener comment that challenged whether technical genius can actually be a form of emotional expression. Then we pivot into something every home studio mixer has wondered about: is the old NS10 translation theory still valid in 2026?

Two very different conversations. One throughline: what does it mean for something to actually work?

You'll Learn:

Why awe and admiration are legitimate emotional responses to music

How the NS10 theory made perfect sense in its era and why it needs more context today

What mix translation actually means with AirPods, Bluetooth speakers, and modern monitoring in the picture

Why "sounds good on bad speakers, sounds good anywhere" now comes with a few asterisks

Topics and Stories:

The Dirk Campbell comment calling Angine de Poitrine's playing "musical parkour" and why we pushed back

Why cathedrals, the Olympics, and a guy spilling wine while distracted by a YouTube clip all ended up in the same conversation

Chris's confession about borrowed NS10s appearing in his old YouTube videos

Why the speakers in your car and living room all basically sounded the same thirty years ago, and how that changed everything

Listener Q&A:

Shoutout to Mastermind on YouTube for the NS10 question. We get into the full translation theory, why it made sense in its day, and how monitoring has evolved enough that it's now more of a checkpoint than a rule.



👉 Got a question for us?
📩 Submit it here: Form Link
We pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments.

And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.
It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.

Studio Stuff Podcast #40 | The Omelet Crisis and How Many Reverbs You Actually Need

Alright, the steak omelets are gone and the vibes are… fragile. But despite the breakfast tragedy, we’re digging into a topic that separates the bedroom demos from the pro records: Reverb. Specifically, are you using it to make things "wet," or are you using it to create a 3D space?

In this episode, we answer Cornelius’s question about how many reverbs are too many. We talk about why we’ve moved away from the "one size fits all" reverb buss and how we use EQ and compression on the reverb itself to keep things clean. Plus, we address a listener who thinks Steve is crazy for needing to "acclimate" to his mixing headphones. (Spoiler: Steve might be crazy, but he's right about the headphones).

You’ll Learn:

Why reverb is actually a dimension tool, not just an effect

The "Feel vs. Hear" rule for modern vocal processing

How to EQ your reverb returns to stop them from eating your mix

Why "Critical Listening" requires a different brain state than the gym or the car

The reason professional reference headphones feel like "learning a new language"

Topics & Stories:

The tragic loss of the Denny’s steak omelet (and Chris’s resulting mood)

Steve’s philosophy on "sub-spaces" for snares vs. toms

Why high-passing your reverb is the fastest way to a pro sound

The difference between AirPods and reference-grade monitors

Why Steve thinks you need to "re-learn" your ears every time you switch gear

Listener Q&A: A massive shoutout to Cornelius for the reverb deep dive and to Rome 81 for calling Steve out on his headphone habits! We break down the technical difference between "casual listening" and "data-driven mixing."



👉 Got a question for us?
📩 Submit it here: Form Link
We pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments.

And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.
It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.

Studio Stuff Podcast #39 | The Band That Broke the Internet (And What It Means for You)

We lost the Denny's steak omelet. But we found hope for music.

There's a band from Quebec called Angine de Poitrine, that stopped us mid-conversation and made us ask a question we hadn't thought to ask in a while: what does it actually sound like when human creativity has no ceiling?

That's where this episode starts. And honestly, it's one of the more hopeful conversations we've had on this show."

You'll Learn:

Why micro-tonal, math rock music is so disorienting at first listen, and why that's exactly the point

What makes this Quebec duo different from just "weird for weird's sake"

How real, raw talent is the most durable weapon against AI-generated music

Why the next generational band might already be building an audience right now

How Steve trained his ears to trust the low end on reference headphones after years on speakers

The EQ-boost technique that bridges the gap while your brain catches up

Topics and Stories:

The band from deep Quebec with more frets than you've ever seen on a guitar

Why loop stations, quarter tones, and impossible time signatures somehow groove

What Genesis, Rush, and 2112 have to do with a sold-out show in San Francisco

Chris's daughter Kayla and son-in-law now casually listening to micro-tonal math rock in the car

How Denny's became the emotional villain of this episode

Listener Q&A:

Huge shoutout to Ryan, who asked a great question about mixing on headphones after years of doing live sound. When you're used to feeling the PA in your chest, reference headphones can feel like mixing in a vacuum. Steve breaks down exactly how he made that mental shift, including the boosted EQ phase, why he gradually pulled it back, and the moment he realized he actually trusted his ears again.



👉 Got a question for us?
📩 Submit it here: Form Link
We pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments.

And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.
It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.

Studio Stuff Podcast #38 | Mixing With Your Eyes: Visual Tools, Meters, and the Mix Bus Limiter Debate

Can you actually mix with your eyes? Should you? We're diving into one of those conversations that sounds like it has an obvious answer, until you really start pulling it apart.

This week, we're talking about the visual tools we actually use in our mixes: spectrum analyzers, tonal balance plugins, phase correlation meters, LUFS readouts, and more. We get into when they help, when they hurt, and how to keep them in their lane so they're working for you instead of turning your mix into a connect-the-dots exercise.

We also celebrate a big milestone, one year on YouTube. If you've been watching and listening, this one's partly for you.

You'll Learn:

Why tonal balance tools like iZotope's Tonal Balance Control are about finding the ballpark — not the bullseye

How freezing Pro-Q's spectrum display changed the way Chris hears his mixes

Why the low end is where visual metering earns its keep (especially in untreated rooms)

When to close the analyzer and just trust your ears and your instincts

How phase correlation meters caught a real problem on a live MCC stream

Why gain staging with your speakers off is not only okay, it's smart

Topics & Stories:

Steve's algorithm keeps serving him Chris's face, even at home, in his off time

AJ calls in mid-recording via the "ring even on silent" feature, it works, everybody

We talk about our favourite spectrum analyzer plugins (Tonal Balance Control, Ozone overlay, the Pro-Q freeze trick)

Chris's journey through three different rooms and why metering became a survival skill

We accidentally prove we've now been doing this long enough to repeat ourselves (we already did an episode on mixing full albums, we forgot)

How ear fatigue makes your meters more trustworthy than your ears after hour two

Listener Q&A:

Big shoutout to Stefan Jorissen for this week's question: "Do you put a limiter on your two bus from the beginning of the mix? What are the settings, and do you adjust them during the mix or adjust the tracks to keep within the desired range?"

We break down the different schools of thought, mixing into a limiter, using one as a bypass reference check, and why Chris eventually stopped mixing with one running the whole time (hint: his mastering engineer's limiter sounded a lot better than his).



👉 Got a question for us?
📩 Submit it here: Form Link
We pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments.

And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.
It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.