​​Patently Strategic - Patent Strategy for Startups

AI can now produce something that very much *looks* like a patent application. It can be long. It can be technical. It can have claims. It can use many of the right-sounding words in approximately the right-sounding places. But does it actually protect your invention? And that distinction—between something that looks impressive and something that creates a durable legal asset — is everything to an inventor hoping to reliably protect their innovation. From a subtle word-choice mistake to a major hallucination, even the smallest details can lead to unintended, fatal consequences for intellectual property rights. And as anyone who uses AI regularly knows, the dangerous part is when it gives you output that is 90 percent convincing. AI can be extraordinarily persuasive while being extraordinarily wrong.

Over this past year, our firm has seen a major uptick in inventor use of AI to brainstorm ideas, organize invention disclosures, search for prior art, analyze office actions, and—in some cases—draft entire patent applications. And why wouldn’t the pioneers and professionals at the forefront of science and technology be using every tool at their disposal for technological and economic advantage? We strongly believe that for both practitioners and inventors, AI offers many compelling, cost-effective uses that should culminate in more robust IP rights. But like with many things at the intersection of technology and law, absolutes are perilous, and the devil hides in the details.

** Episode Overview  **

To help cut through the uncertainty and get to the most effective and responsible use of AI possible, Dr. Ashley Sloat, leads a discussion with a panel of expert patent practitioners exploring where AI is genuinely helping in patent drafting and prosecution, where they’re seeing it go wrong, the surprising ways it can actually increase legal costs, what recent court decisions may mean for confidential information, and some practical guardrails for inventors who want the benefits of AI without inadvertently undermining the very intellectual property they’re trying to protect.

** Mossoff Minute: USPTO Report on Impact of IP-intensive industries  **

In this month's Mossoff Minute, Professor Adam Mossoff discusses a report recently published by the USPTO with data that highlights the importance and impact of IP-intensive industries on the US economy. 
** Links Mentioned  **

⦿ Patent Docketing Specialist job application: https://www.aurorapatents.com/careers-patent-docketing-specialist.html
⦿ Generative AI Tools for Patent Drafting white paper: https://www.reuters.com/practical-law-the-journal/transactional/evaluating-generative-ai-tools-patent-drafting-2026-03-01/
⦿ Aurora's client FAQ for using AI for patent drafting and prosecution: https://www.aurorapatents.com/client-use-of-ai-faq.html.
** Follow Aurora Patents **

⦿ Home: https://www.aurorapatents.com/
⦿ Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuroraPatents
⦿ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/aurora-cg/
⦿ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aurorapatents/
⦿ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/aurorapatents/
⦿ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@aurorapatents
⦿ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@aurorapatents/
Let us know what you think about this episode!

Do patents make drugs more expensive? And what role does intellectual property play in getting new medicines from the lab bench to patients?

The questions have never been more timely. Biopharmaceutical innovation sits at the center of some of our biggest public policy debates. Drug pricing, access, generic competition, university research, venture funding, AI-driven discovery, follow-on research, and the future of biotech startups. And in the middle of those debates, patents are often reduced to slogans like patent monopolies and ever-greening and are assigned the political blame for high drug prices and limited patient access to medical breakthroughs.

But the real system is much more complicated. Modern drug development is extraordinarily expensive, uncertain, regulated, and risky. A promising discovery may begin in a university lab, move through a startup, require venture financing, depend on partnerships with larger pharmaceutical companies, survive years of clinical testing, and then still face manufacturing approval, reimbursement, safety monitoring, and market adoption hurdles.

Along that path, intellectual property is not just a prize at the end. It can be the asset that allows investment, collaboration, disclosure, licensing, specialization, and commercialization to happen in the first place. At the same time, the public has a legitimate interest in access, affordability, competition, and generic entry. So the policy challenge is understanding how the system works, what incentives are actually doing, and what can go wrong when lawmakers, courts, and pundits oversimplify the trade-offs.

This is a big conversation, but the through line is simple. If we want more medicines, better medicines, and broader access to medicines, we need to understand the innovation system clearly before we start rewriting the rules.

** Special Guest: Dr. Bo Heiden **

To help us truly understand the critical role of patent protections in the biopharmaceutical ecosystem and what prevailing narratives mean for investors, startups, and biotech R&D, we’re sitting down with Dr. Bo Heiden, one of the leading thinkers working at the intersection of intellectual property, innovation strategy, and life sciences policy. Dr.  Heiden is the co-director of the Eira Initiative, a project out of the Berkeley Policy Institute, the Executive Director for the Tusher Strategic Initiative for Technology Leadership at Berkeley’s Haas School of Business, the Co-Director of the Center for Intellectual Property (CIP) at University of Gothenburg, and the Co-Chair of the Technology, Innovation, and Intellectual Property program at the Classical Liberal Institute at the NYU School of Law.

** Episode Overview **

⦿ Drug price and access concerns, as they pertain to patents.
⦿ The economic realities that make drug development a uniquely risky investment problem.
⦿ The CliffsNotes history of why the modern biotech system emerged so strongly in the United States.
⦿ What policymakers often miss in narratives around evergreening and patent monopolies, and how those narratives may now be pushing policy in directions that could undermine the very startup and R&D ecosystem we all depend on for advancements in medicine.
⦿ The Supreme Court’s recent Hikma decision and what it means for skinny labels, induced infringement, and generic competition.
⦿ Practical takeaways on two of the hottest areas in the market: AI-driven drug discovery and the evolving GLP-1 regulatory and generic landscape.

** Mossoff Minute: America's 250th and the Democratization of Invention  **

In this month's Mossoff Minute, Professor Adam Mossoff discusses the democratization of invention sparked by American independence.

** Follow Aurora Patents **

⦿ Home: https://www.aurorapatents.com/
⦿ Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuroraPatents
⦿ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/aurora-cg/
⦿ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aurorapatents/
⦿ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/aurorapatents/
⦿ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@aurorapatents
⦿ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@aurorapatents/
Let us know what you think about this episode!

When most people think or speak generally about patents, they’re really talking about utility patents – or patents that are primarily concerned with how an invention is used and how it works. But as it turns out, this is just one specific type of patent on the complete menu of options available for protecting your innovations. Another option, called a design patent, exists to – additionally or alternatively – protect the appearance of your invention. 

And whether you find yourself in an either/or or a both situation, it’s important to consider all tools at your disposal in covering every uniquely protectable functional and visual aspect of your inventions. This is often referred to as building a moat around your business. In this month’s IP Market Insights Newsletter, former guest of the podcast, Louis Carbonneau, wrote that:

"Morningstar’s research has consistently shown that companies with wide economic moats — those with defensible advantages expected to last 20 years or more — dramatically outperform those without. When Buffett said he looks for 'economic castles protected by unbreachable moats,' he wasn’t being quaint".
** Episode Overview **
Design patents play a critical role in your broader portfolio and in making your moat as wide and unbreachable as possible. This is why we’ve enlisted the help of our very own Dr. Tiffany Miller to guide us through all of the do’s and don’ts. As you’ll hear today, Tiffany has some very unique and practical insights into how even the most nuanced aspects of design patents can significantly impact infringement cases.

⦿ The definition, term, and features of design patents.
⦿ How design patents compare with utility patents.
⦿ Obviousness implications for the patent office and the courts – including what to possibly make of the courts wiping the case law slate clean on design patent obviousness back in 2025.
⦿ And some really great interactive panel discussions around real-world design patent examples and how courts have weighed in on patentability.
** Mossoff Minute: Loss of American Leadership  **

In this month's Mossoff Minute, Professor Adam Mossoff discusses the unfortunate loss of American leadership on the international stage in terms of defending the fundamental rights and rules for how we protect patents. 
** Follow Aurora Patents **

⦿ Home: https://www.aurorapatents.com/
⦿ Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuroraPatents
⦿ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/aurora-cg/
⦿ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aurorapatents/
⦿ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/aurorapatents/
⦿ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@aurorapatents
⦿ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@aurorapatents/
Let us know what you think about this episode!

Willful infringement is a patent law concept that applies when someone infringes a patent knowingly or with reckless disregard for the patent holder’s rights. It goes beyond accidental infringement, often involving a deliberate choice to use protected work despite awareness of the rights holder. With unintentional infringement, the infringer can still be required to pay damages, negotiate a license, or face an injunction to halt the infringing activities. If the infringement is deemed willful, however, this can lead to significantly increased damages, sometimes up to three times the original amount. 

This is something that patent holders need to be keenly aware of – both offensively and defensively. If found for infringement, is simply knowing about the competitor’s patent enough? What if it turned up in search results when examining prior art for your own invention? On the other side, if you’ve discovered that a competitor is infringing on you, what steps should you take to ensure that they’ve been clearly put on notice? The answers to these questions could mean millions. 
** Guest Host **
Tamany Vinson Bentz is our guest co-host today. Tamany is the founder of California IP Law, where she currently focuses on developing customized IP portfolios for businesses of all sizes. Prior to managing her own firm, she spent 20 years as a litigator in big law as a partner at both Venable and DLA Piper. 
** Episode Overview **
Tamany and Dave lead today's discussion with our all-star patent panel, delving deeply into all things willful infringement. Along the way, they discuss:

⦿ Willful infringement prior to two 2016 SCOTUS cases.
⦿ How the SCOTUS cases shaped assessment of willful infringement.
⦿ How this has been playing out in more recent cases, and what has and has not been viewed as willful or egregious.
⦿ And some practical tips on how and where to communicate notices if you feel like your patent rights are being infringed.
** Follow Aurora Patents **

⦿ Home: https://www.aurorapatents.com/
⦿ Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuroraPatents
⦿ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/aurora-cg/
⦿ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aurorapatents/
⦿ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/aurorapatents/
⦿ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@aurorapatents
⦿ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@aurorapatents/
Let us know what you think about this episode!

Patent abandonment is the premature relinquishment of patent rights for an invention. Abandonment can happen voluntarily for various strategic and cost reasons, but can also happen silently and unintentionally. It can happen before the right is even granted in the case of public disclosure. But it can also happen after the patent has been granted at many key points in its otherwise useful life and window of exclusivity. Like with other property rights, securing your patent isn’t the end of the line in maintaining that property right. Like property taxes for land and annual registration for automobiles, patents have deadlines and fees that, if not properly managed, can lead to loss of that right. And in all cases – whether abandoned intentionally or by accident - the invention becomes part of the public domain, and the rights holder's exclusivity window to prevent others from using, making, and selling the invention is terminated short of the otherwise expected 20–year term. 
** Episode Overview **
Fortunately, with careful management, the problem can be avoided entirely. And for many unintentional cases, if caught quickly enough, there are remedies for reviving your rights. To help unpack all of this and conquer your fears of abandonment, Albert Du, Patent Strategist and Chief Mindfulness Counselor at Aurora, leads today's discussion with our all-star patent panel, delving deeply into all things patent abandonment and revival. Along the way, Al and the panel:

⦿ Provide a general overview of the utility patent lifecycle to help better frame key points at which abandonment can occur
⦿ Discuss the types of abandonment and the statutes governing each
⦿ Break down when and how to revive an abandoned patent
⦿ And as always, offer countless practical pointers to keep in mind before, during, and after patent prosecution to help avoid what can at best be a costly legal process – and at worst, a complete loss of patent rights. 
** Related Past Episodes  **
⦿ Public disclosure and the on-sale bar
⦿ International patents
⦿ Software patents
⦿ Patent Prosecution Highway
⦿ Continuation practice
** Follow Aurora Patents **

⦿ Home: https://www.aurorapatents.com/
⦿ Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuroraPatents
⦿ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/aurora-cg/
⦿ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aurorapatents/
⦿ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/aurorapatents/
⦿ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@aurorapatents
⦿ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@aurorapatents/
Let us know what you think about this episode!