Powered by RND
PodcastsGezondheid en fitnessRoad Cycling Academy Podcast

Road Cycling Academy Podcast

Cam Nicholls
Road Cycling Academy Podcast
Nieuwste aflevering

Beschikbare afleveringen

5 van 61
  • Why Road Bike Sizing Charts Don't Work (Bike Fitter Explains)
    Summary In this conversation, expert bike fitter Neil Stambry discusses the inadequacies of road bike sizing charts and emphasizes the importance of individual differences in bike fitting. He explains how factors like flexibility, body proportions, and personal comfort can significantly affect the choice of bike size and model. The discussion highlights the necessity of professional bike fitting to ensure optimal comfort and performance for cyclists. Bike Fit Fundamentals: https://roadcyclingacademy.com/bike-fit-fundamentals/ 15% Off code (first 10 people): RCAYouTube15BFF Takeaways Road bike sizing charts often fail to account for individual differences. Flexibility and body proportions play a crucial role in bike fitting. Two cyclists of the same height may require different bike sizes. A good quality bike fit is essential for comfort and performance. Bike models can vary significantly in geometry, affecting fit. Self-assessment of body proportions may not be sufficient for accurate fitting. Professional bike fitters can help identify the right geometry for cyclists. Understanding one's own physiology is key to finding the right bike. BikeFit Fundamentals offers a structured approach to bike fitting. Comfort on a bike is vital for long-distance rides.   Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Road Bike Sizing Charts 03:06 The Limitations of Sizing Charts 05:46 Understanding Individual Differences in Bike Fitting 08:52 The Importance of Professional Bike Fitting   Transcript:    Cam Nicholls (00:00.046) Welcome back to the RCA podcast where today I am joined by expert bike fitter, Neil Stambry, and we're gonna be talking about why road bike sizing charts don't work. Just be aware this chat is also intended for YouTube. So please excuse any visual references. Let's get into it. All right, so Neil, recently I wanted you to write an article for the RCA website on a blog about road bike sizing charts. And you're like, hang on a sec. They don't work, so I'm writing an article. like, oh, we should make a video about this then. We should yeah deceptively simple question with a really annoying long-winded answer, so let's dive into it What is a road bike sizing chart so look some of the manufacturers you look on their website And you'll see a chart. It's got a list of like like you. Cam Nicholls (00:50.904) Bites of sizes, small, medium, large. Here how large this is how tall you are. This is the frame you need then you're okay She's all right better go and get that medium or whatever that is Why don't they work some of them have are really quite detailed some of them have like Obviously can work because they're there and you know. They can sort of work. They can sort of work. I'll explain. They're very hit and miss. There's plenty of, there's enough people out there that fall, even though they fall into one of the correct ranges for the correct height, they should go for a different size bike. We'll try and nut out a little bit about why that is. Some of them are a bit more detailed. They have multiple data points. A lot of them just have your height and this is the one you should have, which is obviously insane. But if you've got really long legs or short legs or something, it can totally change the frame geometry that you'd look for. Well, it's like an anecdote as well before you go. I rode a 56 for maybe five years. Did you? Yeah. Yeah. Because I'm right on the border of a 56 and a 54 and I do have short legs. Yes. And then I went to a 54 and my life changed. Neill Stanbury (01:47.822) Yeah, you're unusually low seat height for a 56 centimeter frame. It'd be you're right in the realms of a 54. Yeah, so yeah, you're great example. Yeah, just just here. So Yeah, why don't they work? Let's use let's use two hypothetical twin brothers, right? They both got exactly the same height They both got exactly the same leg length, same arm length, right? So they're falling within some of these, let's say they fall in the range for a 54 centimeter race geometry frame. One of them has got hips which don't flex up beyond 120 degrees because he inherited a different set of genetics from his mum versus his dad, which means that his hip joints are particularly immobile. In addition, he's been sitting at a desk eating Twinkies for 20 years and he's 15 kilos overweight. He's got a bit extra around the middle and he's all hunched over because he's an and the other guy is a supple yoga teacher who flexes around a lot and he's 15 kilos lighter and he's got amazing hip mobility. So these two guys have the same skeletons, right? But vastly different flexibility levels and vastly different, in particular, hip mobility levels. And hip mobility, as your knee is coming up to the top of the stroke, is one of the primary determinants of how much drop you will tolerate to the front end. So if your hips can come right up, you've got amazing mobility in your hip joints, it's likely that you're gonna ride in a more deeply flexed position preferentially compared to a more upright position relative to your identical twin brother who sits at a desk and eats Twinkies. So what this will mean is that the guy who's really flexible who's got amazing hip mobility his drop to the bar might be 50 to 80 millimeters more sort of severe than the guy who sits more upright because he's got the extra weight and his hips are not so flash. So you might choose a bike with a 30 or 40 millimeter lower stack in the front end which immediately moves you from something like Specialized Roubaix which is one of the one of the least aggressive geometry endurance frames on the market. It's a really short tall bike. We often sort of recommend these to older guys who sit quite upright, people who don't have a lot of capacity for reach and drop in the front end and they're a fantastic bike for that. You might go for the you might you know the the guy who's the accountant he might go for one of those but the guy who's the yoga teacher who's really hyper flexible he might need 50 80 millimeters more drop you know a normal sort of Neill Stanbury (04:06.416) drop number from the highest point of the seat to the center of the bar, you might be looking at a 54 centimeter bike. A normal number, about 100 millimeters, which is about what my drop is, right? But the really inflexible guy might need 50, and the really flexible guy might need 130. Huge differences in the stack. So obviously the flexible guy, he's never gonna be able to get the bar low enough if he buys a Roubaix to be comfortable. And conversely, the guy's very, very stiff. He's not gonna be able to get the bar high enough if he buys a tarmac, or specialised. So this is a great hypothetical example, just one of the many things of what can make these charts not work very well. They're just looking at... You're referencing two separate bikes, just playing devil's advocate here, you're referencing two separate bikes here, not referencing the same bike. Yeah, so you could you could go for like the what I mean is that the the recommendations for the sizing could be so far off that not only are you looking at changing the size of the frame but the actual the entire model of the frame Yep, yep, so you know Yeah, okay, so it's almost deceiving. So somebody's like, oh well I'm actually a medium here but you actually know you should be a medium in a different bike altogether. Neill Stanbury (05:17.046) Yeah, so you might have something that's like long and low, know, let's use your tarmac as an example And then you've got your rubay, which is short and tall So you might be the flexible guy might be on a 52 centimeter tarmac with a hundred and thirty millimeter stem because he can get out and down to that low front end and then not only is the the short, know, the inflexible guy with a bit of a gut not only is he on a rubay, completely different bike model that's really upright and comfortable in the front end and very tall but he's probably on a 54 With a shorter stem so not only are they different sizes with different componentry, but also completely different frame models Yeah, so yeah, I've seen situations where people have rocked up and they've they've looked at her I had a great example to use a great example. I had a young fella came down from northern Queensland last year I think it was And he bought a Madone, know 20 20 odd thousand dollar bike really expensive bike and he he walked in the door He had the shortest legs I've ever seen on anyone who was a bit he was about my height, but his seat height was When we were done his seat height was 50 maybe 60 millimeters lower than mine because his legs were so short We couldn't get the seat low enough because the Medone has a certain amount of seat post travel before the goes into the frame and it blocks out We were 20 millimeters too high even with the seat as high as it could as low as it could possibly go There was no chance of him riding it and it was a 54 because he fell right into that range of the 54 with his height and I said mate you're much better suited with a 52 because we just can't get the seat low enough first of all, but even a or a 49 would have been fine for that guy even though he's my height. you know limb length and all that sort of stuff and flexibility levels and arm length and torso length there's just so many things that come into it which mean that sizing charts can be very hit and miss. What's the solution? Yeah, what's solution? That's what I was gonna ask. Neill Stanbury (07:04.622) Solution is a good quality bike fit. Yeah, you've got to set your position up on your current bike such that you're comfortable and then extrapolate from the geometry of that. Forget about what you should be on because you're a certain height. Look at what you actually need in terms of the geometry and your bike fitter can help you out with that. Can you self assess before deciding whether a bike sizing chart is gonna work? So for example, if you know all your limb, you know, your torso and your lower is standard and your flexibility is good, are you more likely to be served by these charts? Possibly, possibly. But there's so many things you can't know about yourself. True. Yeah, like relative mobility levels in your hips compared to other people and all this sort of stuff. Yeah, it's very hit and miss. Yeah, see I didn't know I had a hip impingement and I've been riding for 12 years before I came to see you. Yeah, I mean not to harp on too much, but that is why my profession exists. It's one of the reasons my profession exists is to not only solve biomechanical problems and aches and pains and make you more comfortable, but also to get you precise correct geometry for your next bike. Cam Nicholls (08:08.34) Yeah, and I am way more comfortable on that bike over there, which is the BMC Road Machine versus the one directly behind you because I'm more upright. Yeah, yeah, I think I think when we looked at the geometry for the team machine are it was I think you had 10 millimeters or so more dropped than you than you had the time I'd fitted you before which was on an SLR one I think and then that one I think we found out that the bar center was about 15 or 20 millimeters higher and that's you know You were right on your edge with the SLR one that was a little bit too low and that's very nice. Yeah for long rides Exactly. Yeah. All right. Well, if somebody is watching this and they're like, well, I wouldn't mind some support with actually understanding my physiology and what bike might work for me. You put something together called BikeFit Fundamentals. Yeah, it'll be a good first step to get yourself in the ballpark with your fit so that you can then extrapolate from your current geometry of your current frame to a potential new purchase and make sure you get all the componentry right. Seven part course, mate, the link's in the description. We highly recommend it. It's been a really good thing. Thanks for time. No worries at all.    
    --------  
    9:45
  • Big Gains, Small Hours: Cycling Personal Bests on 5 Hrs/Week
    Summary In this episode of the RCA Podcast, expert bike fitter and sports physiotherapist Neill Stanbury discusses his recent performance improvements despite a reduced training load. He shares insights on the impact of dietary changes, weight training, and the importance of understanding insulin resistance in optimizing cycling performance. The conversation highlights how strategic adjustments in training and nutrition can lead to significant gains, even with limited time for workouts. Takeaways Achieving best performance on reduced training hours is possible. Dietary changes, including reduced sugar intake, can enhance performance. Weight training is crucial for improving cycling power. Intermittent fasting can help manage energy levels and cravings. Insulin resistance may affect performance and energy management. A balanced approach to training can yield better results than sheer volume. Listening to your body is key to optimizing performance. Incorporating strength training can lead to muscle gain and improved cycling. Energy management is critical for endurance athletes. Finding time-efficient training methods can enhance performance without burnout. Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Performance and Training Dynamics 03:06 Dietary Changes and Their Impact on Performance 05:56 The Role of Weight Training in Cycling 09:04 Insights on Insulin Resistance and Energy Management 12:06 Optimizing Training with Limited Time 13:48 Conclusion and Reflections on Training Strategies RCA Coaching: https://roadcyclingacademy.com/  Transcript: Cam Nicholls (00:00.11) Welcome back to the RCA Podcast where today I am joined by expert bike fitter and sports physiotherapist, Neill Stanbury. Just be aware that this conversation is also designed for YouTube, so please excuse any visual references. Let's get into it. All right, Neil, I wanted to talk to you about your recent performance on the bike because like many people, like many RCA members, I would say you're in bit of an off season phase because we can't train 10 to 12 hours. You know, all year, it just doesn't happen. So there are periods of the year where you go down to about four five hours per week, which is what you are in right now. Yet you went out and did a bunch ride recently and you achieved an all time best five minute power and an all time best or almost best 10 minute power. And for those familiar with chronic training load, your CTL, also known as, is about 40 at the moment, which equates to about five hours per week of riding versus normally when you're training For something, you're doing about 8 to 10 hours per week. So how is it that you could go out and achieve all-time best numbers, 5 and 10 minutes is pretty significant, on 5 hours per week of training? It's been really interesting for me. I don't talk a lot on our channel about the performance aspect of cycling because I'm more interested in the biomechanics and that sort of stuff. But this has been really, really interesting for me. we were talking about it extensively before we recorded this. I thought there might be some interesting lessons in here for people at home who want to try this as well. So I'll tell you what I did and how this came about. But you're right, I did a bunch ride a couple of weeks ago with a bunch of guys who are way fitter and faster than me. And even sitting in the wheels and rolling the occasional turn, I managed to do an all-time best five minute power, about 340 watts, which for me is... Huge numbers, mate. 66 kilos at the most. Cam Nicholls (01:49.098) Watch your weight, people will want to know your weight. Powder weight wise, pretty solid. Not terrible for an old bloke like me, especially an old bloke who's only riding four hours a week or so, and with no particular cycling talent either. But I managed to do that and I've never done, that's biggest number I've ever done for five minutes, which was really interesting because I've done almost no training. Is this the A group or the B group? Was it? there you go. Even rolled a couple of turns with Kavan Wiggo. Just a couple. So these guys are obviously much more powerful riders than me and especially on flat terrain. These guys have got 10 kilos, 15 kilos on me. you know I might be able to be up the front on hilly terrain but on flat terrain I really struggle against these kind of guys. So it's a huge challenge for me. So how did this come about? Now I started noticing earlier in this year that I was sort of waking up Cam Nicholls (02:38.818) Fatigued more often than not I was jumping on the bike and I had sort of low energy levels that typical sort of mid-afternoon you're feeling sleepy that sort of thing and I thought you know there's a lot of things this could be but one of them is it could be the beginnings of some insulin resistance stuff going on so I've been reading a lot and listening to a lot of podcasts about About sugar and all that sort of stuff and I decided to make some changes to my diet and to my training mode to see what would happen to my body I've always struggled to put on weight, right? I've been, ultrally, my entire life. I started lifting weights dedicated twice a week without fail. Twice a week doing lots of legs and a bit of upper body. And I slowly managed to put on, over that last sort six month period, about three or four kilos of pure muscle mass, which was helpful. So I'm about three kilos, maybe three and a half kilos heavier than I usually am, down at that 63 kilo mark. gym sessions are twice a week and you're doing legs in both of those sessions and a little bit of upper body. What sort of sets and reps are you doing? out of curiosity. Typically I'll do Bulgarian split lunges and single leg RDLs and I will do some Cossack squats or deep squats as well with like a goblet squat, that kind of thing. This is all just with hand weights and kettlebells. There's no gym equipment involved. I do it all myself at home. Three sets of about eight of the heavy ones and then if it's something like a Cossack squat with a 16 or 18 kilo kettlebell held in a goblet position, I will then do sort of probably three sets of 20. okay. Quite high reps. That is high reps. Cam Nicholls (04:11.52) Yep, it goes against the science. Mm-hmm. Although as Aaron the Strength and conditioning coach the RCA says sometimes you're just better off moving some stuff around. Yeah, which is what you know 20 reps as you're moving stuff around. really like Yeah, so I'll do I'll do heavy like my single leg my single leg split lunges I'll be using a 22 kilo hand weight so on each leg and for that's a third of my body weight well Which is quite a lot and three sets of eight or three sets of ten of those sometimes four sets of eight And so I do a heavy heavy fit the starter then larger volume with lighter load for the other ones Nothing too complex there in addition to the weight sessions. I started doing one day a week of intermittent fasting Now this is something I've never done before. It was really, really difficult in the beginning, but I was noticing that I was really craving carbohydrates a lot. And I thought it was just due to my training load, right? I was eating very clean rice, that sort of stuff for my carbohydrates, oats, that sort of stuff. I was eating very clean carbs, not a lot of pure sugar apart from the drinks that we drink on the bike, which are essentially pure sugar. And I thought, you know, let's try and move away from the sugar for a while. And I started doing intermittent fasting one day. Every Monday, I'll just not eat breakfast. I'll get all the way through till about 12 30 before I have lunch and I try and make that lunch a pure protein meal and the dinner if possible pure protein and veggies So almost a zero carbohydrate day just one of the seven days in a week when When do you have your last meal on a Sunday? Six, so it's about an 18 hour fast. Cam Nicholls (05:36.654) Typically about 6pm. About an 18 hour fast. It was tremendously difficult in the beginning. Once my system got used to it, now it's easy as pie. I reckon I could go through to dinner without any great trouble. And that's probably gonna be the next sort of iteration of this is to try a 24 hour fast. So probably once a month or so. Just see what Yeah, absolutely. There's no way you can ride and then fast afterwards. It's just gonna be a recipe for disaster. It's on a day when you're not doing any training. Cam Nicholls (06:04.098) So I did those two things and the third thing I did was I drastically reduced my sugar intake which was essentially that was basically drinking liquified sugar on the bike. I am just a sugar and cordial guy. I just use white sugar but if you're using a carbohydrate drink that kind of thing I really cut those back. So on my Zone 2 rides even if it was sort of a two and a half hour Zone 2 ride zero liquid carbs I would basically I would eat a little bit of light breakfast at a banana before I went and then maybe another banana halfway through. get home and have a proper meal afterwards. And I basically cut out the liquified sugar during my rides. The theory being that the liquified sugar is very, it's very inflammatory to your endothelial system and your liver and all that sort of stuff. And what I was trying to do was figure out if I'd been starting to develop a bit of insulin sensitization, which is a common problem. I think it's much more common than we give it credit for, but a little bit of insulin. Sort of reluctance essentially where your nervous system is is relying too much upon the carbohydrates as an energy source And I was trying to shift my metabolism back towards more of a fat burning metabolism in between the heavy hits of for example when I would do a fast bunch ride or a Vo2 session I would carb up for those sessions and then in between I would drastically reduce the carbohydrates down now This is hard to do if you're doing big loads if you're doing 10 hours a week very, very hard, but when you're only doing four to five hours a week, it's actually pretty easy. And after about a month of this, I noticed that my endurance was way better. My general energy level on the bike, way better. I was waking up, I was sleeping less, waking up more like earlier in the day, but with much greater energy. And I was having a lot less days on the bike where I got on and just felt kind of dull and fatigued. Most of the rides I would get on and feel really, really good. So I started noticing after about a month of this that my zone two power output for the same heart rate, about 125 to 130 beats a minute, was jumping by about 20 to 30 watts. So I typically tap along in zone two at about 200 watts. I was suddenly doing about 220 to 230 with the same heart rate. So a really big jump. And this sort of reiterated to me that I was either overtly fatigued, maybe my nervous system doesn't cope with eight to 10 hours a week very well, Cam Nicholls (08:21.734) Or it was just basically insulin resistance, know, insulin and carbohydrate, like critically dependent metabolism. And so the theory being that if you can switch your metabolism over to utilize both energy sources, you might be a bit healthier and do a little bit better. And this culminated with me doing, I did a couple of VO2 training sessions and then I went and did this bunch ride, got home and I thought, gee, I felt fantastic in that ride. Got home and looked at the numbers and went, that was my best ever five minute. power by about five or ten watts and it was the best ten minute power I've done for probably around two or three years. Wow. And this wasn't even up a climb this was in a bunch ride rolling turns you know where you're on and off the pedal. It's not a big bunch ride, so it's not like a three hour bunch ride is it? Because you would have suffered. But this is on the pedals, it's about an hour isn't it? Yes. Cam Nicholls (09:12.586) about an hour on the pills really, really, really hard. Yeah, so I thought that was really interesting. So my take home from this is that perhaps training more is not always the solution. If you're trying to increase your power output, sometimes it's a healthy idea to look at your metabolism deficiencies. And if you are a person who is exhibiting some of those traits, things like craving coffee in the morning, not being able to function with high energy levels without stimulants throughout the day, That mid-afternoon crash in energy waking up tired and you know bleary-eyed and and and not sort of feeling energetic until mid-morning that type of thing often a sign of insulin resistance So yeah, this this is really really interesting for me It's been a real eye-opener and I feel way better with a little bit of extra muscle mass less training load on the bike and more weights and perhaps that's the other take-home message here is that the the weight training super critical Super critical for some people. I didn't realize how much I was missing out on until I really got diligent with it. I used to do some leg weights probably twice a month, you know, just to keep it going. But this has been for six months, continuous, two days a week, and it's made a huge difference. So a lot of kind of all these things coming together, you can kind of think of this as kind of a metabolism rebuild that I tried to do. Very, very interesting for me, and I don't think I'll ever go back to the way I was before, which was just lots of riding. lots of sugar and constantly going up and down, yo-yoing in my performance, I felt much more steady with my performances with this sort of dietary and training change. Interesting. Yeah, so there you go. Interesting kind of anecdote for you that people at home, hopefully there's a bit of interest in this and yeah, if you guys have got any similar experiences, I'll be very interested to read the comments on this one, because I reckon there might be a few people out there with the same problem as me. Yeah, well I've got a similar story and that is that I haven't been doing any of the diet things and I haven't been fasting. I need to get back into that because I used to do it but I've actually implemented a workout that's been going around the RCA community recently because one of our members was stuck on a boat cruise with his family for 10 days. Cam Nicholls (11:25.902) stuck. Yeah, he was training for a seven-day charity ride So he's doing big volume and all of a sudden he only had access to a gym bike So one of the coaches shared a research paper and the research paper Demonstrated actually Maintaining FTP and improving sprint power over a three-week period where you're just doing endurance training But incorporating a one session which includes 30 seconds Yeah, so I've dropped off on 30 seconds all out. I'm not in a three week transition phase, I've been in a 16 week transition phase since my last event. I've been doing about five hours per week. once a week I've been doing this sprint session. So it's 30 seconds all out with a four minute recovery. You do five to six. Yeah, yeah. And you can break them up into two sets. So you could do three sets of, sorry, two sets of three reps with a, you know, like a 10 minute recovery in between. many of those do you do in a second? Five to six. Cam Nicholls (12:19.598) And I recently went out and did a bunch ride. Had done a bunch ride for three months and I normalized for 90 minutes. So there's some durability in there as well. Cause I was able to pull turns at the end of the ride, which surprised me. 310 Watts, I normalized power and my FTP now would probably be 330, 340 pushing it. I would have thought so. I was very surprised at that myself. And I feel. the one change for me was just purely implementing that one workout. I guess the take home story is, if you're only doing four or five hours a week, there are probably ways you can optimize what you're doing, whether it's a workout, whether it's nutrition, fasting, going to the gym. So you can still go do the group ride with your mates, pull some turns and not get dropped off the bar. Yeah, yeah, absolutely. Yeah, I don't think Massive volume is is potentially the answer for a lot of people, you know If you if you're time-starved and you're still looking to optimize your performance like this is some of the best performances I've ever done and with very little training a CTL of 40 and in a really really low-load almost no structured training just a couple of VO2 sessions with some 30 15s that you've mentioned before and some bunch rides and I'm still still feeling as good as I've ever felt and the one bonus here is Lots more free time to do other things. Exactly. Because you're not always out on the bike. Exactly. And you probably a bit of freshness in there as well might have contributed. Cam Nicholls (13:41.838) Yep, absolutely. Yeah, so an interesting case study, mate. You and I have both similar experience by the sounds of things. There you go. Cool, thanks for sharing. Hope you enjoyed that conversation with Neil Stanbury. We'll catch you in the next podcast.  
    --------  
    13:55
  • The Most Important Joint for Road Cyclists (Bike Fitter Explains...)
    Summary In this episode of the RCA Podcast, expert bike fitter and sports physiotherapist Neill Stanbury discusses the critical role of the sacroiliac joint in cycling performance. He explains how dysfunction in this joint can lead to significant issues, including pain and reduced endurance, particularly due to asymmetrical movement patterns. The conversation also covers corrective measures and exercises to address these issues, emphasizing the importance of maintaining symmetry for optimal cycling performance. Takeaways The sacroiliac joint is crucial for cycling performance. Dysfunction in the sacroiliac joint can cause significant issues. Asymmetrical movement patterns can lead to pelvic torsion. Pain is a major detriment to cycling performance. Symmetrical cyclists tend to have better endurance. Corrective exercises can help address asymmetry. Sacroiliac joint torsions are common among cyclists. Understanding your own asymmetry is vital for performance. The joint has a significant number of proprioceptive nerve endings. Addressing these issues can improve overall cycling function. Chapters 00:00 Understanding the Sacroiliac Joint 07:02 Addressing Asymmetry in Cycling Online Bike Fitting Course: https://roadcyclingacademy.com/bike-fit-fundamentals/  Transcript: Cam Nicholls (00:00.11) Welcome back to the RCA Podcast where today I am joined by expert bike fitter and sports physiotherapist, Neill Stanbury. Just be aware that this conversation is also designed for YouTube. So please excuse any visual references. Let's get into it. Neil, what have you got in front of you there? This is a spine, hopefully it's not a real one, right? I never thought about that before. Hopefully this is a plastic replication of a real one, otherwise I'm probably gonna get in trouble for this. no, purchased directly from eBay, this is almost certainly plastic and not real, but this is a spine and a pelvis. And I wanted to show you guys, I get asked this question a lot, like to do with, when we're sort of explaining asymmetrical movement patterns to people on the bike, and when people come in with really big, what we call pelvic, This is a question that I get asked a lot. It's kind of interesting. So let me run you guys through a bit of anatomy I'm gonna try and describe to you why I think this joint here called the sacroiliac joint is probably the single most important joint for cycling in in terms of Its correct function if it's dysfunctional if this joint doesn't work well, you're in big trouble on the bike Now what is the sacroiliac joint? It is the joint between the sacrum and the ilium's there's two sides of the pelvis here the left and the right side This joint is two in the body, one on the left, one on the right. It's a sliding or a gliding diarthrosis joint, which is a fancy way of saying it's not a joint like your shoulder or your knee or your finger. Basically, this is two faces of bone which sit in on each other like this. There's a massive collection of really strong ligaments across the front and the back. And this joint moves about five degrees or so, not much. It rolls forwards and backwards and on the inside faces of the joint, it's got kind of a knurled surface that kind of... Interlocks the two the two sides got little valleys and depressions in it which interlock now the joint doesn't move much But why is it the most critical joint for cycling? Performance the reason being that this joint when it's dysfunctional it causes more havoc than any other joints in the body I've found for riding a bike Which is really interesting because it doesn't actually move that much the joint seems to be incredibly important Neill Stanbury (02:09.634) for proprioceptive function of the leg and for general kinematics of the rest of the leg. If it is dysfunctional, what happens is as you drive down on the pedal, for example here, if your left leg is driving down on the pedal, the sacroiliac joint, as the hip extends, is supposed to roll forward a little bit. And then as the hip comes up over the top of the stroke, it's supposed to roll back a little bit. So it's supposed to basically just move a little bit like this, forwards and backwards, forwards and backwards. Because of the planes that the two SIJs operate in, like this, They go like this, rhythmically, as you're walking, running, cycling, all of that kind of stuff. Now if you operate asymmetrically on a bike for a long period of time, let's say you've got a rider who's dropping their right hip forward because their right leg is shorter than their left, for example. Typically what will happen is the right ilium will get a lot more forward rotation with very little rearwards rotation, and the left one will get the converse going on, is that it will have to rotate backwards a lot more than forwards with every pedal stroke. Now we do this about 4,000 times an hour and some of us are doing 15 or 20 hours a week. You multiply it out, it's a lot of repetition, right? Over time, the pattern is that you can develop what we call a pelvic torsion, where the two, that's what I call it anyway, the two sides of the pelvis mutate relative to each other. So their neutral position, they're supposed to just be symmetrical, their neutral position starts to gravitate towards an asymmetrically dysfunctional, know, torsional position. So when you're sitting in a seat for example watching TV, it'll be like They're just sitting like that, right? The reason that they get like this is complicated, but basically the the muscle, the drag of the muscle system of all the large muscles which attach onto the pelvis, the quadriceps and the hamstrings and the glutes, the drag of them becomes sufficiently asymmetrical that the two iliac, the sacroiliac joints become torsion at rest to each other. Now when they get torsion at rest, this is starts to, this is usually where you start getting pain. Neill Stanbury (04:02.466) bike and this is why this joint is so so seriously compromised when it's really compromised it's so serious for your function on a bike because when they get torsion it's usually because you've got really large-scale asymmetry happening on the bike and it's affecting your muscular system which is then dragging the two sides of the pelvis out of plane with each other and as they go out of plane with each other what's embedded in the side of the pelvis your hip joint so as the two sacroiliac joints move like this it changes the neutral position of the two hip joints. And the two hip joints, the ball and socket joints, they start to go out of plane with each other. And you'll see the person basically flaring one knee away from the bike and the other one's coming right in towards the top tube, which is a classic pattern of complicated asymmetry that we'll see all the time, typically because the person's been dropping their right hip forward a lot of the time. And this torsional effect is catastrophic for a lot of things. It causes most notably pain. And as I've said many times before, pain is the single biggest detriment you'll ever have to your performance on the bike. If something is hurting, your nervous system is going to curtail your power output really significantly. Not only that, when the pelvis is torsioned, the complicated compensatory patterning which goes on really takes a lot of energy, a lot of neurological energy, which really hammers down your endurance. It really causes trouble. You basically end up utilizing a lot of calories compensating that you could have used for pressing down on pedals. This is one of the reasons why highly symmetrical people tend to have better endurance than highly asymmetrical people. And the asymmetrical people will usually find that one hamstring blows out before the other one on a long hard ride or one quad or something like that. So this torsional effect is really really serious for your function on the bike. Typically the side effects if they go forward on the right back on the left is left-sided gluteal pain, left-sided ITB pain, left-sided lower back pain, but the pain is what curtails your performance mostly on the bike. So the Sacroiliac joint, because it's such a critical joint, when it goes bad, I've never seen any other joint in the body cause as much trouble for a cyclist as this one does, which is really fascinating because it is such a, it's a joint which barely moves at all. Depending upon which textbook you read, you might see like five to eight degrees of rotation in the SIJs. So really, really unusual joint. Neill Stanbury (06:28.992) It seems to have a lot of proprioceptive nerve endings in it. I've heard, I've heard bandied about numbers that contain within the sacroiliac joints, you might have 30 or 40 % of all the proprioceptive nerve endings in your body contained within these joints. So they're really, really critical for posture, balance, general function, all that sort of stuff. And when one of them gets torsion backwards or jammed up, you're in big trouble. Okay, so how often do you see that in your clinic with people coming through and then what can you do about it? Ah, what can you do about it is a complicated question. Take up hockey. Take up hockey. What you want to do first is you want to correct for the asymmetry on the bike and then you want to give them corrective exercises off the bike which they vary between people but we give them isolated strength training to do for the weak muscle groups to try and correct the torsional drag that's happening on the pelvis because of that. But how often do I see it? We see it probably, I probably see three decently torsioned SIJs every week. When they, and that would be out of potentially like 10 to 12 people that I fit in a week, something like that. So it's fairly common. Now there's different grades of how badly they get twisted. A lot of people just have a mild adaptive torsion and they haven't yet gotten to that end stage where when one of the iliums gets turned back a lot, it can actually get like jammed. They can actually get stuck. And that's when you get really big trouble is when they get stuck and they don't move. That's when a lot of the pain really starts. But in terms of small adaptive torsions, yeah, probably about a third of people. It's really, really common. But when it gets really bad, and these are the ones which we're sort of referencing more here in this video, when it gets really bad and one side gets jammed and it won't move properly, that's when you're in big trouble. So sacroiliac joint torsions are really catastrophic for your function on a bike and in general in everyday life. But cycling, there is no other joint that affects your function as much as the sacroiliac joint in my experience. Cam Nicholls (08:26.7) Interesting. If somebody's interested in figuring out how they can deal with this from the comfort of their own home, you've put together a program called Bike Fit Fundamentals which has a tutorial on asymmetry. I think it's think it's part six or seven. Yeah, we're right. Yep. That's the one mate It goes through a lot of the corrective or a lot of the what would you call it? Diagnostic methods of figuring out your asymmetry and it's pretty detailed and this is a good first step to try to prevent or Reverse this fun this this situation if it's starting to happen to you at home Because yeah this long-term effect of compensating asymmetrically on the bike is really problematic for this joint with a downloadable guide. Neill Stanbury (09:06.316) and the flow down effects through the rest of your kinetic chain, really, really catastrophic. yeah, that is a really good first step is going through that asymmetry module to try and correct your own asymmetry and see how you go from there. Hope you enjoyed that conversation with Neil Stanbury. We'll catch you in the next podcast.  
    --------  
    9:25
  • Why Inseam Measurement is Irrelevant (For Bike Fit & Saddle Height)
    Summary In this episode of the RCA Podcast, expert bike fitter and sports physiotherapist Neill Stanbury discusses the common misconceptions surrounding inseam measurement in bike fitting. He explains why traditional methods of measuring inseam are not reliable indicators of seat height and highlights the various anatomical factors that contribute to effective leg length. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding individual anatomy and the limitations of relying solely on inseam measurements for optimal bike fitting. Takeaways Inseam measurement does not correlate well with seat height. Anatomical variations significantly affect leg length measurements. The shape and size of the saddle can alter effective seat height. Measuring inseam is often a waste of time in bike fitting. Bike fitting should consider individual anatomy rather than generic measurements. The LeMond method for seat height is flawed. Effective leg length changes with pelvic rotation and saddle shape. High inseam measurements can be misleading based on body composition. Bike Fit Fundamentals course offers a comprehensive fitting guide. Understanding your body is key to proper bike fitting. Bike Fit Fundamentals: https://roadcyclingacademy.com/bike-fit-fundamentals/    Transcript:  Cam Nicholls (00:00.174) Welcome back to the RCA Podcast where today I am joined by expert bike fitter and sports physiotherapist, Neill Stanbury. Just be aware that this conversation is also designed for YouTube, so please excuse any visual references. Let's get into it. Okay, Neil, everyone wants to know my inseam height when we do a... Okay. It's not... Fit video mine too. Yep relevant new I get this question a lot in the comments actually I do occasionally read the comments I usually check out of the comments because there's just 10 million of them now that we're a big big enterprise, mate There's just there's a lot of noise down there So I don't often delve into the comments because it's just too much to go through and I'm too busy But when I do read through them particularly with the bike fit videos and stuff like that a lot of questions about what my inseam is what's your same. Number one question. I think it's like 89 centimeters. Yeah, so mine's quite long for my like I've got a really short torso and long legs, right? You've never measured your inseam? No, not yet. Yeah, I never measure inseams. Back in the day I used to measure inseams and record it as part of my my fits and I've completely stopped doing that probably 10, 12 years ago, a long time ago I stopped doing it and the reason for that is I found no great correlation between the seat height that we were ending up at at the end of the fit and the inseam measurement. So I wasn't really using the number for anything. measured my Neill Stanbury (01:18.83) Interesting. So I just ditched measuring inseams. Now if you're not sure what measuring an inseam entails, we basically get the person to stand up against a wall, flat feet on the ground, know, heels on the ground, knees locked out straight usually, no shoes on, no thick socks, and then we put like a book or a spirit level or something up in here. this rather, you know, centralized section of your anatomy here. We jam it up in there and then we get you to step away from the wall and measure how high it is. Right. So this is what they call inseam measurement. Which is sort of supposed to be a proxy for leg length measurement, right? And I'm going to tell you today why that's a bad move. For those of you out there who've purchased our BikeFit fundamentals course, you'll notice that one of the things that isn't in there is inseam measurement because again, there's just no great correlation between the seat height and the inseam measurement and if you could say that there's a loose correlation I guess but there's so much variance. You might get the same person with an inseam of 80 centimeters and another guy with an inseam of 80 centimeters and their seat heights might vary by 50 millimeters, like huge variance that it just basically becomes so useless, the number, there's just no point even measuring it, Now, one of the methods of measuring seat height or of setting your seat height, I think they might have called this the LeMond method back in the day, is to measure your inseam and then multiply it by number, and that's just supposed to be your seat height, right? Now, let's delve into the many ways in which this is a terrible idea to set your seat height, people at home. First problem, let's say- How many problems are there? I don't know, I'm gonna talk till I run out. There's quite a few. Let's say you've got two identical people with identical bodies and one of them has a slightly longer coccyx, this little bone in here which comes down off the bottom of your sacrum there. And one of the coccyx is it kind of comes down lower and the other one curls inwards more like that. You can just sort of see it kicking in or being very straight. The coccyx is almost, a lot of the time, the first thing when you jam something up you're gonna measure it. The first thing that comes into contact with your book spine or your spirit level or whatever. So the length of your coccidial protuberance here determines your leg length. Obviously not. Makes no difference, right? So this portion of your anatomy, if it varies, it's gonna alter your inseam measurement. Second problem. The height of these ischial protuberances downwards here, inferior iliac spines here, what people commonly think of as your sit bones, right? The height of these relative to the center of the acetate Neill Stanbury (03:44.174) that height there, the difference between the two, varies hugely between people. So as a measurement of leg length, which is, you know, you can think of your leg length as being the center of the rotation of the acetabulum down to maybe the ground if you're standing still, the difference between that and that can be anywhere from 30 millimeters up to 90 millimeters, depends on the person, right? So the height of the acetabulum inside the pelvis relative to the sit bones is highly variable between people. So even if you do manage to measure, somehow to your sit bones and you get a reasonable kind of dimension there for your inseam measurement, this number blows it out up, down, whatever. Doesn't make a difference. Another problem, if the person rotates their pelvis forward fairly well versus sitting fairly upright, the height of these relative to the rotational center of the hip changes the effective leg length more or less because this arc, this radius, if you think of it as a radius of movement here, This arc changes the effective leg length a lot. So if the person was, say, extremely bent forward on the bike, this is kind of going to be level with that relative to the vertical plane that the crank is operating down there. Whereas if they're sitting bolt upright, you're going to get a completely different dimension effectively for the length of your leg. So inseam measurement for this reason is another terrible idea because as you roll forward, you just kind of... change everything, all of the three-dimensional relationships between them alter so much that it's not even worth thinking about. Another one just to make it, we're going down lots of rabbit holes. As your femur comes out here and goes down, the angle at which it comes out and then kicks down, what we call the femoral neck here, highly variable between people, really, really different. The angle that it comes forward or backward is highly variable between people. Both of these two things alter the effective seat height. when you're sitting on the bike, they alter the effective length of your leg, irrespective of where your actual in-scene measurement is, right? So in-scene measurements, if you've got a really lean person, you might get that spine and that book right up much higher. If you've got a person with slightly larger soft tissue around their backsides, for example, you might get a situation where that spirit level or that book spine that you're putting up in there is sitting down lower. So you're not getting a very good measurement there anyway. Neill Stanbury (06:08.078) So the common idea is you take this number and you multiply it by .883, I think was the old LeMond mechanism, and that's supposed to be your seat height. Terrible idea for all of those reasons. Another one is the saddle that you're sitting on, the shape and the size of the seat. Some of them, if it's particularly narrow seat, you're gonna sit deeper over the saddle. If it's a wider seat with a broader back, you're gonna sit up higher. So just by virtue of... the nature of the shape of the saddle itself, you're get huge potential variations in the effective seat height that you're measuring anyway. So I've seen multiple situations like, I see this probably five times a week, where we change saddles for a given rider on a given seat height. We go from something like an SMP back to a flat style SLR boost or something like that. And you've gotta drop the seat 10 millimetres into the frame or lift it or move it forward or backward. So the effective seat height changes a lot. based upon how your anatomy interacts with the saddle. And when you're trying to basically set the seat height based off a number, there is just for all of those reasons and more that I could, you know, we could go down endless rabbit holes with this, inseam measurement is a terrible idea as a method of measuring your seat height. So one of the reasons that my inseam might measure so high is because I'm so lean. There's not much bum on me mate. You know, I don't know. You have noticed, yes. A lot of people are noticing that in the comments. getting a lot of ribald comments down there. So because I'm so lean down there, I think that inflates my inseam measurement. Yeah, okay. So, for a person who's 173, 174 centimetres last time I checked, an inseam dimension of 89 centimetres is crazy high, like really, really high. Does that mean I've got particularly long legs? Eh, probably. but it could also mean that for all those reasons that we mentioned before, my inseam measures very high. So that is a more detailed explanation of why I don't even bother measuring inseam when I'm measuring people. And if you go and have a bike fit and they measure your inseam and they set your seat height based upon your inseam measurement. Ask for your money back. Red flags, Warning lights are flashing. And again, we've had a lot of questions in the Bike Fit Fundamentals course, people who've been going through that course. Neill Stanbury (08:25.262) They haven't asked me to measure my inseam and this is why there is just no point to it It is just such a highly variable method of measuring that it's just not worth doing. It's not even worth spending three minutes doing. Okay. Yeah you sold me. So if you're watching this and you're like, I want to set my saddle height properly now, you mentioned bike fit fundamentals. What's that? Yeah bike and fundamentals. That's our seven part course that we did last year our program that we did Detailed detailed 15 to 20 sometimes 25 minute modules seven of them and downloadable guides downloadable guides This will step you through the process one after the other Sequentially how to fit yourself to a road bike to a pretty high level We're very proud of it took a lot of work and it's out there for purchase if you guys want to go through the process yourself you enjoyed that conversation with Neil Stanbury, we'll catch you in the next podcast.  
    --------  
    9:15
  • A Zone Two Training Hack (Anyone Can Do)
    Summary In this episode of the RCA podcast, host and coach Ben Treble discusses innovative techniques to enhance cycling fitness through zone two training, focusing on the importance of proper breathing. The conversation explores how diaphragmatic breathing can improve performance, lower heart rates, and enhance overall cycling efficiency. Listeners are guided on how to implement these breathing techniques during their training sessions, with practical advice on intervals and progression. The episode concludes with real-world applications and benefits observed by athletes who have integrated these methods into their routines. Takeaways Zone two training can become monotonous, so mixing it up is essential. Breathing techniques can significantly impact cycling performance. Diaphragmatic breathing is crucial for improving VO2 max. Proper breathing can lower heart rates and improve recovery. Breathing exercises can reduce perceived exertion (RPE) during workouts. Integrating breathing techniques into training can enhance overall fitness. Focus on breathing through the belly for better oxygen intake. Progress breathing exercises from zone two to higher intensity efforts. Athletes have reported lower heart rates and improved performance with breathing techniques. Adding breathing exercises has no downside and can only improve cycling efficiency. Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Zone Two Training 02:59 Understanding Breathing Techniques 06:02 Implementing Breathing in Zone Two Rides 08:51 Progressing Breathing Techniques in Training 12:06 Real-World Applications and Benefits of Breathing Exercises RCA: https://roadcyclingacademy.com/  Cam Nicholls (00:00.12) Welcome back to the RCA podcast where today I'm joined in studio by RCA coach Ben Treble. And today we're going to talk about a zone two training hack you can use to boost your overall cycling fitness. Apparently that's what I was just hearing about offline, which I'm interested to learn a little bit more about. And I think it's a good one as well for a lot of people out there that get a little bit bored is the right word with zone two training, but You know it can be a little bit monotonous so something that we can use to mix things up So Ben, what do you got for me? We're doing some zone 2 maybe we should Preface this one by talking about what do we mean by zone 2 because there are many more other versions of zone 2 There's a scientific model There's a heart rate model. There's a power model like are we talking about? Something specifically here, or we're not getting too carried away. We're just doing like aerobic work Yeah, don't need to get too carried away. I where this idea came from, I mean, it's not my idea. It's not a new idea, but I had an athlete that, you know, you do zone to ride, let's say it's one hour, two hours on Swift and it gets a bit boring. Like how do you make it more interesting? whilst being productive. And the idea that I ended up with was, you know, I learned this actually over at the UCI level three course around. you know, often a low hanging fruit that's missed is learning how to breathe properly on the bike. Hmm. You know, like particularly let's talk about VO2 max, you know, hot topic at the moment, you know, everybody's pretty good at doing some sort of VO2 max intervals, but we don't, and we often only think of, we're fairly narrow minded in thinking about to improve VO2 max, we do intervals on the bike. don't think about how else could we improve. VO2 max from, because it's not just how you push the pedals, right? It's, there's a lot more involved in when we think about what VO2 max is, your, you know, your maximal volume of oxygen consumption that involves your whole cardio respiratory system. key, very key component of that is breathing. So the idea was let's try and break up the zone to ride by adding in some intervals at the same intensity, but there's just simply, you know, the, the, Ben Treble (02:25.794) wording on the interval is a reminder to just purely focus on your breathing for say it's a five minute interval and then we progress to longer intervals. Okay, so when we say breathing, are we talking about like, are we working, you know, breathing through the chest? Are we focusing on the stomach or the diaphragm? Or like, are we narrowing in on something before we talk about what the intervals look like? Because I know like, you do forget about this one, it's like, yeah, the diaphragm. You know, don't often think about the diaphragm when you're doing your training, you think about your legs. and your lower back and maybe some numb hand that you get on your handlebar. So like if we're doing zone two training and we're focused on the breathing, what are we focused on specifically? The scientific term is diaphragmatic breathing. It's also called belly breathing. I think in its most basic form, that's the first step to improving your breathing would be to think about expanding your belly and breathing through the belly. The goal that you want to get to though would be a picture. If you picture your chest and your belly, that whole torso area, as if it was a big can of Coke and someone shook it up and it's expanding in the heat. That's what you want when you breathe. You want your chest, your belly, your ribs, your back. So behind you, you want it to expand outwards, forwards, upwards at the same time as evenly as possible, which is quite hard to do. if we come back to why is this important? Because a lot of new writers, they work Monday to Friday jobs, sitting at a desk. They just breathe through their chest and they often have shallow breathing. And this is a learned muscle recruitment pattern. Ben Treble (04:10.136) that you have. And when you end up doing high intensity intervals, your body's going to revert to its natural muscle recruitment patterns, including when you breathe. And so you're to just breathe pretty hard through your chest and your ribs will limit your breathing capacity a little bit. So let's talk about how do we shift that and improve how much oxygen we're going to breathe in. So you can improve your tidal volume. And then if you improve the strength of those diaphragmatic muscles through some exercise intervals like this, you're going to improve the pressure when you breathe out, which will improve your partial pressure and it'll improve the diffusion of the oxygenated blood into the capillaries, which is going to improve your call it your VO2 max or your ability to do high intensity intervals. Okay, good. I'm wondering, there's probably a lot of people out there listening at the moment, myself included, just sitting opposite you that's already started to just breathe a little bit differently. I'm like, yeah, okay. I was chest breathing and now I can feel as I'm breathing and focus more on that sort stomach region, which then sort of continues into the chest. Things are a lot different. Yeah, you feel karma. do feel calm. Your heart rate's going to drop. Your body immediately gets a parasympathetic response. So it's going to reduce the heart rate, improve your heart rate variability. And you get that, that parasympathetic response across the body, which reduces your stress. That translates if you teach yourself, it's difficult to, to practice that in a high intensity of four minute VO two interval. It's very difficult to practice that. course. That's why one, I target the zone two or even your recovery rides and I break it up with intervals that are just let's focus on the breathing. See how much you can reduce your heart rate through focused breathing in that five minutes. And when you, it's much easier to do that at low intensity. So you're going to practice that and hopefully the aim is to build the new muscle recruitment pattern. So then when you start doing high intensity work, you should naturally start breathing better when you're doing that high intensity work and it should improve. Cam Nicholls (06:02.67) Okay. Ben Treble (06:20.012) your, it should lower the RPE. That's where the science is at. So if you're breathing a lot better, it's going to reduce the RPE and improve your ability to sustain those high intensity intervals. So yeah, pretty good one. the other science on this that, you know, I did a little bit of extra research on this cause that's where I was at. and the science behind this was it should also improve your posture and it should help reduce things from tinglingness in the arms. and to your power output, or if you have back injuries, it's just going to help use every muscle in the body. And it's going to reduce the load on the legs. And the last big benefit that was quite interesting was when you're breathing more efficiently, which is what we just described, you got to think that your, your, your cardio respiratory system is a subset of muscles. Like the intercostal muscles is a big group and they require energy to work. If you can use those muscles more efficiently, they're going to do the same amount of breathing for less energy. It's going to save that energy for your legs. Okay, that's good. All right, you've sold me. So what is it if I'm doing a zone two ride? You know, I'm going for an hour on the train or maybe it's two hours as we have here where I live down the coast. That's a common zone two ride or maybe somebody doing three hours on two ride. Like what are they doing? Like how does an interval look like? Give an example and add another layer on that up. You know, I've been into breathing in the past, not so much on the bike but off the bike. you there's the Wim Hof method and all these things and they talk about you've got to breathe in through your nose because the nose filters the air, warms it and it becomes more efficient when it goes into the bloodstream. So you know are we mouth breathing, are nose breathing? What does it look like? Ben Treble (08:06.038) Yeah. I do like breathing in through the nose and out the mouth. for me, main benefit, no, that's very difficult. So yeah, preface high intensity stuff. You're to be mouth breathing. Good luck trying that with nose breathing. Maybe if you're a pocket show, VR2 max Ben Treble (08:24.642) But when you breathe through the nose, it limits the amount of oxygen or the volume that you can breathe in, like how fast you can feel those lungs. And so naturally what it does is it forces you to breathe in over a longer period. when you have shallow breathing, it's often short. You might be breathing in and out in one, two second increments. So the practical side of this is I would put in a one hour zone two ride, probably three, five minute intervals, three to four. And it's at the same intensity. So you just try and maintain the same power. But the focus of it is you would start in the most basic form, try and breathe through the belly, which is going to help you breathe out everywhere and start with trying to breathe in for three, hold it and then breathe out for three. Yeah. Well, you don't have to hold it for three, probably for two, but you just want to hold it for at least a period. Yeah. Don't just breathe in and straight back out. in, hold it for a bit. Cause it's going to help strengthen the muscles and then for three seconds. Cam Nicholls (09:23.352) through the mouth, through the nose when you're the... You breathe in through the nose. To me, it doesn't matter that much, but if you breathe in through the nose, it's going to force you to do it longer. And you want to progress. So if you can do it for five seconds in and out, that's great. I think that's the target is to get to a five second in and out. Some people like to do this with the pedal strokes. So you might say, as you're breathing in, try and get through five revolutions. That's another way to count through it. And then as you're breathing out, try and get through five revolutions. Okay, cool. And you're doing this for... I would just try this for five minutes because it's actually, it's a very, it should be a very focused effort. And I think it's actually a little bit mentally draining when you start doing this. And so that's why I just do five minutes. Oh, and I think you can also lose focus very quickly at a zone 2 level, know what I mean? Because you're sort of plodding along and quite often I get caught in my own thoughts and you you drift off so five minutes sounds like a good period. Ben Treble (10:14.318) Yeah. And then I would just build it up. And this is a, you know, we just had a good chat about winter training. Great time in winter training to train this. might even do a full block, say like a four week period where you start in the first week, trying to get through two of your zone two rides. You've got three, five minute intervals of breathing. And by the end of the four weeks, you want to get to a point where, you know, you're doing 20 minute intervals and then you testing that out, uh, when you do some high intensity stuff, potentially. Okay, and do you, you know, with the RCA members at UCoach who are doing this, do they progress that breathing into other zones as well? So like I'm thinking, obviously you wouldn't go straight to, you know, top end zone, but like you get them to do tempo efforts or any sweet spot efforts or is this something that you think is a good idea? Because obviously at a zone two level, it's easier to probably be doing this may become more challenging as you go up the zones. Yeah, I would definitely progress it into tempo efforts. Okay, and a tempo effort if you're out there listening, zone three, so power wise we're talking what's at about 75 to 85 percent of FTP around there. Ben Treble (11:25.752) Yep, around there. It's going to be the job. Okay, and have you had any feedback from some of your athletes that have been doing this? What have they said about the workout specifically and any things that they've noticed on the bike? highly where it came from was a conversation with an athlete I had around their zone two workouts and they were concerned about cardiac drift or they felt like their high rate was just increasing too much towards the end of a zone two ride. I think there were other factors at play like heat strain throughout an indoor workout was a one factor. And I was trying to think of how do we help this athlete because we're not going to change the work that they're doing. the zone two work they're doing is going to help improve the cardiac drift and the progressive increase in volume will help reduce cardiac drift. But that takes time. And so I thought, let's try get that heart rate down a bit more with some breathing exercises. So a lot of secondary benefits, but at the end of the day, we did it even for two weeks. And when we did our weekly catch up in the second week, we looked at the heart rate response and we looked at the RPE and the comments. And the comments simply were I could feel the difference. I could feel that I managed to get my heart rate five to 10 beats lower than it was at the start of the five minute breathing interval. And then by the third week, we managed to get the heart rate to be around 10 beats lower in average for the whole workout. Wow. And in the space of one week, you're not going to see a massive, you know, shift in say just pure cardiac drift stuff, but Ben Treble (13:08.136) I would say a big portion of that was just through breathing. Interesting. So, yeah, pretty significant drop in RPE. And I think this helps everything from recovery to a whole lot of subset of things. Yeah, and it's such an easy one to do, but such an easy one to forget about as well. I'm going to go try this myself. know, particularly I think on the indoor trainer as well, I struggle with those own two rides. They're very boring. So this is going to be a good one for me to test out. Yeah, I think it's a great one. often talk about low hanging fruit and often when you target something in your cycling training, it means that you're not doing something else, but adding breathing exercises into a zone to work out. To me, there is no downside. There's only a possible upside. So what have you got to lose by trying it? Cam Nicholls (14:00.288) Very good point. Such a good point. We're gonna leave on that point. Thanks again for joining us, Ben. And look, if you're looking to implement these things and work with the coach, get support with these types of things, make sure you check out the RCA's website, www.roadcyclingacademy.com and there you can hire a coach. Even, can you hire Ben at the moment or are you at capacity? I'll always make room for some people. All right, thank you, Tom, and we'll catch you in the next podcast.  
    --------  
    14:32

Meer Gezondheid en fitness podcasts

Over Road Cycling Academy Podcast

Interviews with top performing cyclists and industry experts in the fields of coaching, advanced training techniques, and human physiology. The purpose of this podcast is to learn and understand what makes high performing individuals tick, digging deep into their ingredients to success both on and off the bike.
Podcast website

Luister naar Road Cycling Academy Podcast, De Vogelspotcast en vele andere podcasts van over de hele wereld met de radio.net-app

Ontvang de gratis radio.net app

  • Zenders en podcasts om te bookmarken
  • Streamen via Wi-Fi of Bluetooth
  • Ondersteunt Carplay & Android Auto
  • Veel andere app-functies
Social
v7.23.9 | © 2007-2025 radio.de GmbH
Generated: 10/18/2025 - 8:23:54 PM